2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7_72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Additive Manufacturing Process Selection Using MCDM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future studies should consider the Industry 4.0 technological enablers, viz. Additive manufacturing (3D printing), blockchain, IIoT, virtual manufacturing, etc., to understand the strategic fit of these technologies with MS aspects (Dohale et al , 2021a, c). Researchers should determine the strategic fit of these technological elements with the production systems, manufacturing decisions, and manufacturing performances to justify the deployment of these technologies in manufacturing organizations (Dohale et al , 2021c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Future studies should consider the Industry 4.0 technological enablers, viz. Additive manufacturing (3D printing), blockchain, IIoT, virtual manufacturing, etc., to understand the strategic fit of these technologies with MS aspects (Dohale et al , 2021a, c). Researchers should determine the strategic fit of these technological elements with the production systems, manufacturing decisions, and manufacturing performances to justify the deployment of these technologies in manufacturing organizations (Dohale et al , 2021c).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, an entire globe is witnessing the disruption in manufacturing and supply chain operations due to the unprecedented COVID-19 pandemic (Dohale et al , 2021a, e; Okorie et al , 2020). Thus, it would be interesting to exhibit the congruence of different aspects of MS with BS, CS, and supply chain strategy for determining the level of fit between them to mitigate the risks to manufacturing and supply chain operations owing to disruptive events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MCDM based AHP conducts the pairwise comparison of decision criteria and develops priority weights using the popular integer-valued 1-9 AHP scale (Mardani et al, 2015). The AHP model represents the problem in a hierarchy and divides it into sub-problems comprising criteria and sub-criteria (Bouzon et al, 2016;Dohale et al, 2021c). Although AHP received the general acceptability, decision-makers (DMs) may face difficulty in processing ambiguous information and results in subjective judgment due to the integer-valued crisp scale (Jakhar et al, 2020;Liu et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AHP is a most utilized multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique. MCDM techniques are most suitable when the study aims to determine the appropriate alternatives (Dohale et al. , 2021c).…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… AM process selection tools include methods to assist in the selection between conventional processes and AM and within different AM processes, e.g. (Meisel et al, 2016;Wortmann et al, 2019;Dohale et al, 2021). Other categorisations of DfAM approaches refer, e.g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%