Additive vs. Conventional Manufacturing of Metal Components: Selection of the Manufacturing Process Using the AHP Method

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) processes have experienced significant technological developments over the past decade. Today, 3D-printed metal parts can almost achieve the mechanical properties of conventionally manufactured components; process times have been shortened, and the range of available materials has been widely expanded. The decision between conventional manufacturing and AM is therefore becoming more complex, considering technical and economic criteria along the entire product life cycle. To reflect the vision of the manufacturer, each decision needs to be based on individual preferences and strategies. The present research introduces a standardised and systemised multi-criteria decision-making process to choose between additive and conventional production. Multi-criteria decision models from within the literature are analysed and a holistic decision matrix is developed based on the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The key novelty of the present research is the consideration of technical and economic categories along the whole product life cycle for decision making. The matrix allows an individual weighting of individual criteria along the product life cycle, starting with the conceptualisation of the product, and ending with marketing and after-sales. The approach is evaluated using two scenarios, including a control unit housing and a flat metal gasket, with different scopes of application. In conclusion, the developed multi-criteria decision matrix provides sufficient and repeatable results. The systematic decision process allows users to clearly identify the best production method for their individual use case.

Challenges and Opportunities in Additive Manufacturing Polymer Technology: A Review Based on Optimization Perspective

“…Figure 2 describes the hierarchy of the MCDM method and more details are given in Section 3. MCDM tools are AHP (analytical hierarchy process) [19], TOPSIS (technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution) [20], ANP (analytical network process) [21], BWM (best worst method) [22], FAHP (fuzzy analytical hierarchy process) [23], COPRAS (complex proportional assessment) [24], and PROMETHEE (preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations) [25]. In this, a pairwise matrix is created based on the opinions of the decision maker, and it is converted into numerical values from 0 to 9 (based on the MCDM tool/technique) [26].…”

Desarrollo de un método para seleccionar la tecnología óptima en fabricación aditiva de metales mediante un proceso analítico jerárquico (AHP)

“…Se ha observado que esta metodología es útil en el campo de la fabricación para la compra de diferentes técnicas de fabricación, la selección de una tecnología de fabricación óptima y para la selección de la mejor tecnología de fabricación (Schuhmann et al, 2022) ya que permite evaluar y comparar diferentes opciones basándose en múltiples criterios importantes como el coste, la calidad, la fiabilidad, la productividad... etc.…”

Green Manufacturing-Oriented Polyetheretherketone Additive Manufacturing and Dry Milling Post-Processing Process Research

“…In addition, AM reduces the cost and processing time for the production of custom and small-batch components [7]. AM is a "clean" or "green" process compared to traditional manufacturing processes [14].…”