2022
DOI: 10.1075/prag.26.4.05for
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Address practices in academic interactions in a pluricentric language

Abstract: Following the recent development of address research in pluricentric languages (Clyne et al. 2006), the present study describes address practices in English-speaking academic settings and pursues two main objectives: (a) to provide a profile of address patterns in academic interactions in Australian English; and (b) to compare address practices in higher education across the three dominant varieties of English, namely American English, Australian English, and British English. The data on Australian English are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If pattern 1 has been previously described in the literature as a default address practice in academic interactions in English, for instance in some American universities and partly in some British universities [7,10], pattern 2 has never been reported as a relevant address practice in Anglophone academic institutions and might be distinctive of ELF courses, as a result of the diverse linguacultural composition of participants. The coexistence of several sociopragmatic norms of reference for address may in fact induce participants to keep on the 'safe side' of more formal and respectful address forms, deemed more appropriate in institutional and hierarchical domains of interaction like the academia, thus minimizing the risks of offending the interlocutor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If pattern 1 has been previously described in the literature as a default address practice in academic interactions in English, for instance in some American universities and partly in some British universities [7,10], pattern 2 has never been reported as a relevant address practice in Anglophone academic institutions and might be distinctive of ELF courses, as a result of the diverse linguacultural composition of participants. The coexistence of several sociopragmatic norms of reference for address may in fact induce participants to keep on the 'safe side' of more formal and respectful address forms, deemed more appropriate in institutional and hierarchical domains of interaction like the academia, thus minimizing the risks of offending the interlocutor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, very few students report that interactions are more formal in the Italian ELF courses than in their home institutions. Once again, reference is made to the sociopragmatic norms at work in their native cultures, in particular to the widespread informality and egalitarianism typical of the Australian academic setting [10], and to the friendly and relaxed academic interactions in South American countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In United States of America universities, professors are typically addressed by title and students by first name to maintain a professional relationship (Formentelli & Hajek, 2016). Students typically refer to their professors by title last name (TLN), using titles such as "Doctor" or "Professor. "…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%