Addressing Europe's Urban Challenges: Lessons from the EU URBAN Community Initiative

Abstract

Urban issues have moved up the European Union's policy agenda over the past 10 years. Since the launch of the URBAN I Community Initiative (CI) in 1994, urban issues within regional policy have increasingly featured in EU policy documents. This paper presents the findings of the ex-post evaluation of the URBAN CI that was implemented from 1994 to 1999, funded by the European Commission. It shows that while URBAN-style area-based initiatives were already taking place in some member-states, in the majority of countries the URBAN CI presented an innovative way of addressing area-based urban challenges, effectively leading the way for a sea-change in thinking on urban regeneration in many member-states, both in terms of content and process. The paper concludes with some reflections on the implications of the findings for addressing urban deprivation through area-based initiatives.

Understanding the Scale and Nature of Outcome Change in Area-Regeneration Programmes: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme in England

“…A number of caveats need to be made. Although direct comparisons are fraught with problems, this rate of change is apparently not out of line with that occurring in other English ABIs such as the Single Regeneration Budget (Rhodes et al, 2005) or EU schemes such as URBAN (Carpenter, 2006). It is important too to emphasise that it may take many years for the full effects of NDC sponsored projects to become evident (Atkinson et al, 2006).…”

Local Economic Development in Area-based Urban Regeneration in Germany

“…Area-based strategies are thought to be an appropriate response to the fact of spatially concentrated patterns of poverty and social exclusion (Andersen, 2001;Carpenter, 2006;Parkinson, 1998;Turok, 2004) and 'may even be part of a new Western European policy paradigm' (Musterd & Ostendorf, 2008, p. 89). In Germany, areabased policy solutions to improve social and economic conditions in Correspondence Address: Sabine Weck, ILS -Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development, Postfach 101764, D-44017 Dortmund, Germany.…”

The Continuing Popularity of the Neighbourhood and Neighbourhood Governance in the Transition from the ‘Big State’ to the ‘Big Society’ Paradigm

“…Similar trends have been observed in European states such as France and Denmark (Hall and Hickman, 2002;Kennett and Forrest, 2006;Smith et al, 2007). The neighbourhood was also the primary focus of European Union sponsored initiatives such as the URBAN I and II programmes (Carpenter, 2006). But these trends raise important questions about why there is so much emphasis on the neighbourhood and why central government should devote political capital and resources to what appear to be largely local issues.…”