1998
DOI: 10.1080/03043799808923524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing First-year Issues in Engineering Education

Abstract: Engineering education is being reviewed worldwide, for its approach to developing adaptiue, creatiue, communicalive engineers who can work effectioely in a team and be aware of the broader implications of engineering on society. The first year has been a focus for many coursesfor several reasons, and this paper attempts to col/ale various approaches which have been made across the world relating to first-year issues. The literature is reviewed and discussed alongside the results of a survey, exploring the vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many introductory courses for freshmen engineering students have evolved into serious pedagogical initiatives aimed at 'developing an Downloaded by [Simon Fraser University] at 02:53 19 November 2014 awareness of the engineering profession and, in particular, ways of thinking and attitudes necessary for the practitioner' where students welcome teamwork from the beginning (Baillie 1998). Hence, these courses, which often include team problem solving (Porter and Fuller 1998) and/or design team projects (Courter et al 1998) present a great first opportunity to introduce students to the complexities of organizational life, including a basic concept of IPTs.…”
Section: Curricular Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many introductory courses for freshmen engineering students have evolved into serious pedagogical initiatives aimed at 'developing an Downloaded by [Simon Fraser University] at 02:53 19 November 2014 awareness of the engineering profession and, in particular, ways of thinking and attitudes necessary for the practitioner' where students welcome teamwork from the beginning (Baillie 1998). Hence, these courses, which often include team problem solving (Porter and Fuller 1998) and/or design team projects (Courter et al 1998) present a great first opportunity to introduce students to the complexities of organizational life, including a basic concept of IPTs.…”
Section: Curricular Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They will work with upperdivision engineering students who will help evaluate the content of the work done by their peers. Peer feedback and assessment have received positive results and have been utilized to address challenges such as timely and efficient feedback [16] as long as expectations and feedback are consistent [17] and peers are properly trained [18]. Engineering students in the upper level courses will also be able to provide feedback to the lower courses Another key aspect of assessment involves both the long-term reflections of students about their learning experiences and capturing what they learn into some persisting structure.…”
Section: Curriculum Delivery and Assessment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, by 1998 departments were still being encouraged to focus on student learning and consider reducing student work volume and address learning styles. 33 Given this decade of support for change in engineering courses the author's departmental learning, teaching and assessment committee decided to seek information on first year students' approaches to studying in 2001. The relationships between the learning conceptions that students hold and their academic ability also requires further exploration for two reasons.…”
Section: Qualitative Conceptions Of Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%