Addressing health inequities through social inclusion: The role of community organizations

Abstract

Health inequities between groups result from the unequal distribution of economic and social resources, including power and prestige. Social processes where unequal power relationships exist lead to the social exclusion of individuals or groups. Social inclusion strategies are well suited to contribute to addressing health inequities. Community organizations can enhance marginalized community members' inclusion in decisionmaking structures that affect their lives. In this paper, we discuss the role of community organizations in contributing to action on health inequities through social inclusion. We consider the social determinants of health and of inequities. We provide an overview of the impact of social exclusion on health inequities and on community capacity to address them. We explore the theoretical basis of addressing health inequities through social inclusion, both in collective action and in research strategies. We link theory to practice with examples from our experiences and describe the challenges of involving members of vulnerable populations. We conclude by offering suggestions as to howPortions of this article were presented in a poster at Downloaded from community organizations can foster social inclusion and some directions for future research.

The ethics of community-based research with people who use drugs: results of a scoping review

“…However, such groups may require additional support, time, training, and material resources in order to participate in research; they may also have more explicitly political aims and activities that conflict with some researcher agendas. We believe that more attention should be paid to defining and mobilizing communities of people who use drugs, with an ethical orientation towards supporting drug user self-organizing (recognizing that participation in research may help fledgling organizations to develop capacity) [ 7 , 51 , 52 ].…”

Addressing Adverse Childhood Experiences: It’s All about Relationships

“…A growing body of research indicates that increased CC may decrease the prevalence of ACE and related behaviors [85]. CBPR, as previously described [84,85], fits well within the community capacity framework. CBPR strategies including asset-based assessment, potentiate capacity building by mobilizing networks to identifying local community members (e.g., formal and informal networks of families, longstanding faith-based organizations, state and local service providers, non-profit organizations, NGOs) to provide not only a baseline of existing supports but also identify areas where more resources may be required.…”

“…Given this challenge, CBPR has (re)emerged as an approach that builds the capacities of communities to function as co-investigators, which then yields commitment among all partners and methodologies, and yields results that are more likely to be culturally sensitive and socially valid. For children experiencing ACEs and communities desiring to attenuate ACEs, asset mapping by which community members identify protective factors, skilled professionals, and long-standing assets such as faith-based entities, community-based family supports, and cultural values, CBPR may be a powerful vehicle for understanding the contexts in which adverse experiences occur as well as local resources, strategies, and supports to mitigate their impact [84].…”

Research Apprenticeship and Its Potential as a Distinct Model of Peer Research Practice

“…By providing on the job training and subsequently hiring newly minted skilled workers, engaged research groups would realize aspirational principles of the participatory process (social responsibility, correction of knowledge imbalance, democratization of knowledge) (27,28) and offer a concrete benefit to the disadvantaged communities they engage(29,30). …”