Addressing Health Literacy in Patient Decision Aids: An Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards

Abstract

Background There is increasing recognition of the importance of addressing health literacy in patient decision aid (PtDA) development. Purpose An updated review as part of IPDAS 2.0 examined the extent to which PtDAs are designed to meet the needs of people with low health literacy/socially-disadvantaged populations. Data Sources Reference lists of Cochrane reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PtDAs (2014, 2017, and upcoming 2021 versions). Study Selection RCTs that assessed the impact of PtDAs on low health literacy or other socially-disadvantaged groups (i.e., ≥50% participants from socially-disadvantaged groups and/or subgroup analysis in socially-disadvantaged group/s). Data Extraction Two researchers independently extracted data into a standardized form including PtDA development and evaluation details. We searched online repositories and emailed authors to access PtDAs to verify grade reading level, understandability, and actionability. Data Synthesis Twenty-five of 213 RCTs met the inclusion criteria, illustrating that only 12% of studies addressed the needs of low health literacy or other socially-disadvantaged groups. Grade reading level was calculated in 8 of 25 studies (33%), which is recommended in previous IPDAS guidelines. We accessed and independently assessed 11 PtDAs. None were written at sixth-grade level or below. Ten PtDAs met the recommended threshold for understandability, but only 5 met the recommended threshold for actionability. We also conducted a post hoc subgroup meta-analysis and found that knowledge improvements after receiving a PtDA were greater in studies that reported using strategies to reduce cognitive demand in PtDA development compared with studies that did not (χ2 = 14.11, P = 0.0002, I2 = 92.9%). Limitations We were unable to access 13 of 24 PtDAs. Conclusions. Greater attention to health literacy and socially-disadvantaged populations is needed in the field of PtDAs to ensure equity in decision support.

The Impact of Health Literacy–Sensitive Design and Heart Age in a Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Decision Aid: Randomized Controlled Trial and End-User Testing

“…A recent review of DAs for people with lower health literacy [ 57 , 58 ] showed that DAs that use health literacy design strategies lead to improved knowledge, decisional conflict, and decision-making outcomes. Furthermore, DAs that used explicit strategies to reduce cognitive burden showed greater improvements in knowledge for people with low health literacy and from disadvantaged backgrounds [ 58 ].…”

Primary Care Providers’ Perceptions of the Acceptability, Appropriateness, and Feasibility of a Mammography Decision Aid for Women Aged 75 and Older

“…33 As recommended by IPDAS, the mammography DA was written at a sixth-grade reading level using low literacy principles and uses large font, bullet points, short sentences, and includes illustrations; yet, many PCPs were still concerned about its literacy level. 34 Therefore, investigators have recently developed and pilot tested an even lower literacy mammography DA for women 75 years. 35 The modified DA (also available at ePrognosis) is shorter than the original DA and does not use pictographs since older women with low health literacy who evaluated the original DA found the pictographs difficult to understand.…”

Cocreation with Dutch patients of decision‐relevant information to support shared decision‐making about adjuvant treatment in breast cancer care

“…7 However, processing and using the information in decision-support tools is not easy, especially for patients with lower health literacy (HL) and/or numeracy. 8 Therefore, it is important to design decision-relevant information that suits the needs of patients and at the same time is clear for patients with diverse levels of HL/numeracy. 8,9 The WHO definition of HL is: 'the cognitive and social skills which determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, understand, and use information in ways which promote and maintain good health' 10 In Europe, 47% of the population has too few skills to understand and use health information correctly to make health-related decisions.…”