Addressing how small suppliers cope with large customers: using the dual dimension of a product portfolio and customer buying center

Abstract

Purpose This paper is about customer relationships from the perspective of small suppliers. More precisely, this paper aims to examine the relational implications through a product portfolio model with the main participants of the buying center (buyer/business manager). Design/methodology/approach The study first uses an in-depth qualitative data analysis to explore how elements of small suppliers’ relationship with such large customer’s main actors are affected by the nature of the product (categorized between strategic, bottleneck and non-critical items). From the results, an empirical model is drawn of small suppliers’ relational strategies in a product-centered and buyer/business manager relationship typology. To analyze the results of the empirical model, a quantitative analysis is performed, using the fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis approach. Findings This study contributes to deepen the supplier–customer relationship analysis, from a product-centered and customer dyadic perspective (buyer and customer business manager). The findings highlight three different small suppliers’ relationship strategy with a different level of involvement of the different participants of the buying center. Originality/value Few studies so far analyze vertical asymmetric relationships from a triadic perspective composed of the small supplier, the buyer and the business manager – hence, this study contributes to unveiling some of the relationship complexity within a triad of actors and how small suppliers can navigate through this complexity according to their product or service positioning.

Adoption of digital platforms by sponsoring organisations and NPOs for cause-related B2B marketing programs: a fsQCA exploration

“…To the best of our knowledge, none of the studies have explored under-researched areas of digital platforms for causerelated B2B marketing using the configurational fsQCA approach (Gligor et al, 2021;Shree et al, 2021). Few studies only explore the methodological application of fsQCA in the relational B2B context (Vlachos, 2021;Lacoste et al, 2023;Tzempelikos, 2020;Wegner et al, 2022); the present study adds to this body of academic knowledge.…”

Buying centers and emerging developments: the SME perspective

“…SME purchasing approaches have been described in the Purchasing Development Model for SMEs (Coy at al., 2020) that goes from 'passive' to 'leveraged' to 'strategic' purchasing, based on the importance and opportunity to forge long-term relationships and alliances. Lacoste et al (2023) address the issue of the buyer-seller relationship with the size of the companies and the purchase type and complexity, to provide a comprehensive view of this phenomenon and of the sales and purchase organizations in terms of decision-making and performance. There are also studies that focus on critical aspects such as vertical and horizontal collaboration, which brings advantages in terms of price and delivery times (Ghaderi and Leman, 2013), and buyer-seller information sharing, which helps to manage uncertainty and enhance procurement quality performance (Anin et al, 2020).…”

“…Arli et al, 2018;Hartmann et al, 2018;Hartmann and Lussier, 2020;Wang and Siau, 2019;Kang et al, 2020 P7: Virtual/hybrid relations increase the inter-group cooperation and facilitates co-design initiatives Johnston and Chandler, 2012;Bolander et al, 2015;Wang and Siau, 2019;Vieira et al 2023 P8: Technology produces certainty and automation but also overloads and bias that can be solved with the ability to analyze and clear responsibility for decisions. Thaichon et al, 2018;Lacoste et al, 2023 P9: Virtual interactions must be carried out with flexibility, problem solving, and conflict avoidance, to maintain and enrich the intra-organizational relationship.…”

Open Innovation Frameworks: A diagnostic analysis of deployment, engagement, evaluation, and governance of Open Innovation in SMEs

“…For both people and corporations, management relationships provide significant advantages. Managers with a high reputation for connections and trust can get resources for their organisations, themselves, and their friends and loved ones [86]. These managers can operate more productively since they can skip steps and processes and obtain permissions and permits quickly.…”