Addressing Microaggressions in Academic Health: A Workshop for Inclusive Excellence

Abstract

Introduction Health profession schools have acknowledged the need for a diverse workforce by increasing diversity in recruitment, but little has been done to build inclusive excellence in learning environments. Microaggressions and other forms of mistreatment can increase stress levels and depression and negatively impact academic performance. To increase student performance, retention, and wellness, mitigating microaggressions is needed to promote an inclusive culture. Methods We designed this workshop as a framework to think critically about microaggressions, how they impact the health professions academic environment, and how administrators, faculty, and students can promote inclusion excellence. The workshop included a presentation discussing microaggression theory, seven cases describing microaggressions in the health professions education environment, and discussion and facilitator guides. Cases were based on prior research conducted by the primary author and upon interactions authors shared from their professional experience. Participants completed pre- and postsurveys. Results During six workshops at three different institutions, 138 out of 190 participants (73% response rate), including nursing and medicine faculty, students, and leadership, completed the pre- and postsurveys. Pre- and posttraining measurements found statistically significant improvements in participants' knowledge of the impact of microaggressions, self-efficacy in responding to microaggressions, and commitment to being an active bystander in the face of microaggressions. Participants were highly satisfied with the training. Discussion This humanistic, case-based learning curriculum allows facilitators to guide faculty, student, and leadership conversations to build skills to promote inclusion excellence through preventing microaggressions, repairing and reestablishing relationships, and restoring reputations once microaggressions occur.

Attitudes and Actions Related to Racism: the Anti-RaCism (ARC) Survey Study

“…These possibilities underscore the importance of educating about and studying the relationship between racism and negative health sequelae, as well as training medical students, trainees, and faculty to address structural racism and microaggressions. [8,20,[53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68] Given the widespread discussion of the impacts and pervasiveness of racism during 2020, it is somewhat surprising that endorsing the effects of racism in society did not predict speaking up about a racist encounter or policy. The observed association between endorsing the impact of racism on health and increased likelihood of addressing a racist encounter/policy may reflect that the impact of racism on health is more salient to healthcare providers, and may thus be more strongly associated with behavior.…”

Realizing Inclusion and Systemic Equity in Medicine: Upstanding in the Medical Workplace (RISE UP)—an Antibias Curriculum

“…When we designed this resource, there were many calls for institutional support for anti-racism action but few published protocols. 16 , 17 Published curricula, including those in MedEdPORTAL , cover various facets of anti-racism education, including reducing stigmatizing language, 18 addressing microaggressions, 19 , 20 teaching intersectionality, 21 and generating professional and leadership development on promoting open dialogue on anti-racism topics. 22 At the time of our literature review, no publications described simulation and debrief-based methods for anti-racism instruction that had been specifically developed for virtual or hybrid settings.…”

What Will You Protect? Redefining Professionalism Through the Lens of Diverse Personal Identities

“…We took inspiration from student-led modules on bias, stereotyping, and racism in medicine to redesign our didactic session as a small-group, learner-focused experience. 13,14 Previously at our single-site medical school, professionalism was taught through didactic sessions listing expectations and case examples of unprofessional behavior (Appendix A). In recent years, faculty responsible for these presentations faced challenges with addressing a growing number of concerns raised by students during these sessions.…”