2016
DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2016.7378427
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing next-generation wireless challenges with commercial software-defined radio platforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The exhaustive cross-correlation algorithm can be expressed as (here x * denotes the complex conjugate of x) correlation is O(N L) per time slot 7 , where N is the number of samples per time slot. In [5], we computed the cross correlation offline.…”
Section: Appendix a Frame Synchronization Algorithms For Pncmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exhaustive cross-correlation algorithm can be expressed as (here x * denotes the complex conjugate of x) correlation is O(N L) per time slot 7 , where N is the number of samples per time slot. In [5], we computed the cross correlation offline.…”
Section: Appendix a Frame Synchronization Algorithms For Pncmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on USRP/GNU Radio because of its programmability and flexibility for rapid prototyping [7]. In this platform, the USRP is the RF frontend hardware.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, processingintensive physical layer functionalities are software-defined, but executed in hardware that can be reconfigured in realtime (through registers and partial reconfiguration of the FPGA). Therefore, unlike purely software-defined implementations that introduce high processing latency [18,19] and limit data rates; or pure hardware implementations that lack reconfiguration capabilities, SEANet G2 is able to provide both the low latency and high-data-rate characteristics of hardware implementations, as well as the reconfiguration capabilities of software implementations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, software development suffers from increased implementation complexity and a lack of standard methodology for partitioning the implementation of signal-processing functionalities to heterogeneous hardware platforms. For instance, digital signal processor (DSP) is cheaper, consumes less power, and is easy to develop software applications, but it has a considerable latency and less throughput compared with field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) [1]. For high-speed signal-processing (HSP) communication systems, such as cognitive radio (CR) [2,3] and software-defined radio (SDR) [4], DSP may fail to capture and process the received data due to data loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%