2015
DOI: 10.1002/pmj.21512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing Risks in Green Retrofit Projects: The Case of Singapore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The independent sample t-test has been commonly used to examine whether the mean values of a specific variable from two independent groups were significantly different [16,52,59]. Table 4 suggests that there exists deviation between experienced and inexperienced respondents (Figure 3).…”
Section: T-testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The independent sample t-test has been commonly used to examine whether the mean values of a specific variable from two independent groups were significantly different [16,52,59]. Table 4 suggests that there exists deviation between experienced and inexperienced respondents (Figure 3).…”
Section: T-testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After using their SNA-based risk management model to analyze risks in one green education building construction project in Australia, Yang and Zou [8] found that improving communications and interactions among various contracting parties could effectively mitigate risks in green building construction projects. In addition, Hwang, Zhao, See and Zhong [3] recommended a set of special measures to tackle risks in green retrofitting projects, and they highly recommended the following measures, hiring consultants with sufficient experience in managing green building construction projects to mitigate regulatory risk, increasing public awareness of the benefits of green buildings to minimize market risk, using the delivery method of Design & Build to settle communication issues among various contracting parties, and using equipment and materials that have been sufficiently tested to ensure project quality. Based on the literature review above [2,3,7,8,23,30], this study also compiled a list of 14 measures to mitigate risks in green residential building construction projects.…”
Section: Risk Mitigation Measures In Green Building Construction Projmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that diverse stakeholders recognized ethical/reputational risks more widely and that technological risks were not important as perceived. Hwang, Zhao, See and Zhong [3] identified and evaluated 20 risk factors in green retrofit projects, and they discussed the top eight risk factors in details, including risks associated with post-retrofit tenants' cooperation, regulations, market demand, project finance, pre-retrofit tenants' cooperation, concerns from stakeholders, material supply and availability, and construction quality. Through a questionnaire survey, Qin, Mo and Jing [11] assessed risks in Chinese green building construction projects and found the top five critical risks were complicated approval procedures due to government bureaucracy, poor maintenance in green buildings, lack of design experience on green buildings, lack of experienced property management for green buildings, and inaccurate green goal established by the owner/developer.…”
Section: Risks In Green Building Construction Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations