“…A total of 2849 citations were identified from the seven databases, the grey literature and reference lists; of these, 724 were duplicates, leaving 2125 potentially eligible citations; 58 underwent full‐text screening (Figure 1). Nineteen citations (Canzona et al., 2016; Chanmekun et al., 2022; Dikmans et al., 2018; Krouwel, Hagen, et al., 2015; Krouwel, Nicolai, et al., 2015; Lavin & Hyde, 2006; Masjoudi et al., 2019; Ng et al., 2015; Ray et al., 1984; Reese et al., 2017, 2019, 2021, 2022; Shaffer et al., 2021, 2022; Smith et al., 2011; Takahashi et al., 2006; Vieira et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2015) were eligible for systematic review; of which seven (Dikmans et al., 2018; Hu et al., 2020; Krouwel, Hagen, et al., 2015; Krouwel, Nicolai, et al., 2015; Ng et al., 2015; Smith et al., 2011; Takahashi et al., 2006) were quantitative studies, eight (Canzona et al., 2016; Chanmekun et al., 2022; Lavin & Hyde, 2006; Masjoudi et al., 2019; Reese et al., 2017; Shaffer et al., 2021, 2022; Wang et al., 2015) were qualitative studies, and four (Ray et al., 1984; Reese et al., 2019, 2021, 2022) were mixed‐method studies.…”