Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: A conceptual framework for science-based co-creation

Silva, Muthu De; Гохберг, Леонид; Meissner, Dirk; Russo, Margherita

doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102268

Cited by 39 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 79 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All these instruments form a basis for satisfying the needs of information based STI policy which was reviewed by Morlacchi and Martin ( 2009 ) in their seminal work and which also led to the emergence of innovation studies (Fagerberg, Verspagen, 2009 ). The analysis of field-specific highly cited publications allowed to draw a spectacular evolutionary panorama of science policy and innovation studies (De Silva et al, 2021 ; Gokhberg & Meissner, 2016 ; Martin, 2012 ).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

What semantic analysis can tell us about long term trends in the global STI policy agenda

2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The scope, complexity and the “volume” of knowledge accumulated render producing an overview of the core themes of science, technology and innovation policies difficult. Reviews of this policy domain mostly either refer to general issues without deep immersion into details or focus on specific narrower aspects. The paper uses semantic analysis to identify major themes of science, technology and innovation policies over the last three decades and to trace their evolution towards current policy setting. We use semantic tools for processing and analysing documents produced by one of the major and highly reputable international expert bodies, the OECD Working Party on Technology and Innovation Policy. We show that selected themes remain in the mainstream even though being affected by regular policy adjustments and refinements and which disappear or appear with new challenges and expected solutions. Other themes appear niche or exotic themes which are under discussion for some time only.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

What semantic analysis can tell us about long term trends in the global STI policy agenda

2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this study, we propose a conceptual framework to explain the spontaneous incentive structure of citizens, similar to the one suggested by Reijula and Hertwig (2020). The dual perspective of policymakers and citizens should be central to the collaboration between citizens, policies and bureaus to enhance the effectiveness of social policies, where the scope and type of value generated and the social value are essential (De Silva et al. , 2021).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discussion of citizen behavioural change using the nudge effect: a perspective based on social policy interventions

Yamaoka

2021

IJSSP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThis study aims to present a communication model for promoting value co-creation between citizens and policymakers and to draw out proposals on the rationale in implementing nudge effect as well as key policy implications. The paper also revisits the close relationship between information senders and receivers (citizens) from the perspective of “citizen behaviour change” and focuses on the nudge effect, which strengthens the communication skills of policymakers (information senders) and accelerates the behaviour change of citizens (i.e. the recipients of information). Based on the study, the authors propose a conceptual framework to explain the spontaneous incentive structure of citizens.Design/methodology/approachThis study uses a conceptual discussion based on a literature review. It examines the nudge effect on citizen behaviour based on information and communications models and theories. From critical discussions of literature, it proposes an analytical model that focuses on the nudge effect put forward in behavioural economics and takes into account the importance of measures to increase the sensitivity and empathy of the recipients of information.FindingsThe authors revisited the relationship between information senders and receivers from the perspective of citizen behavioural change and focus on the nudge effect, which strengthens the communication power of policymakers and accelerates the behavioural change of citizens (i.e. the recipients of information). According to the study, the authors propose a conceptual framework to explain citizens' spontaneous incentive structure. The dual perspective of policymakers and citizens should be central to the collaboration between citizens and policymakers to enhance the effectiveness of social policies, where the scope and type of value generated and the perspective of social value are essential.Research limitations/implicationsThis paper bridges the interdisciplinary research fields of behavioural economics and social policy. It is hoped that the model proposed in this paper will be an effective discussion framework for relevant researchers and practitioners when considering human resource training and system building related to information dissemination. In addition, it is hoped the model will be an effective tool for deepening discussions on topics that help to facilitate information transfer and communication within organisations.Practical implicationsThe realisation of policy intentions within the core elements of the social policy process, such as the definition of key objectives, policy mechanisms and legislation, are central elements of policy formation and are said to be highly similar across countries. The framework proposed in this study is a valid resource that can be applied in other countries and can be expected to act an effective guidepost for policy makers and other stakeholders engaged in social policy.Originality/valueUp to this point, in examinations of encouraging behavioural change in information recipients, attention has been focussed on the aspect of increasing the sender's ability to transmit information. Interventions, such as increasing the energy of the delivery, increasing the frequency and diversifying the media to make a strong impression on the receiver's consciousness, have been considered and implemented. However, this study suggests that, in addition to such efforts on the part of the sender, it is important to increase the sensitivity and affinity of the receiver to the message as preliminary preparation to receiving it.

show abstract

“…Another important difference between knowledge exchange and co-creation is that in co-creation the collaboration also involves partnerships in objective-setting and exploration while exchanges focus more on the latter stages of innovation. Co-creation is also closely associated to the notion of "open science", the approach to make the scientific process more inclusive for all relevant actors through the use of digital technologies and new collaborative tools (Dai, Shin and Smith, 2018 [4]; OECD, 2015 [5]) Co-creation initiatives -such as those that were gathered in the OECD-TIP project on cocreation (see Table 1) often share a number of characteristics which include the following:…”

Section: Knowledge Co-creation Is Distinct From Knowledge Exchangementioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge co-creation in the 21st century

Kreiling

Paunov

2021

OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Addressing societal challenges through the simultaneous generation of social and business values: A conceptual framework for science-based co-creation

Cited by 39 publications

References 79 publications

What semantic analysis can tell us about long term trends in the global STI policy agenda

What semantic analysis can tell us about long term trends in the global STI policy agenda

Discussion of citizen behavioural change using the nudge effect: a perspective based on social policy interventions

Knowledge co-creation in the 21st century

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About