2021
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2021.1920519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing student engagement during COVID-19: Secondary STEM teachers attend to the affective dimension of learner needs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, many researchers in the field state that the in-person support prior to COVID-19 without restrictions produced higher achievement results than the online solutions or in-person adaptations that are currently taking place [67,68]. In this context, student engagement in the mathematics classroom is seen as major concern by many researchers [69][70][71][72]. As some students indicated in the discussion groups of this research, it is much more difficult for them to follow the explanations and do the proposed exercises and problems now that there are COVID-19 restrictions in the classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, many researchers in the field state that the in-person support prior to COVID-19 without restrictions produced higher achievement results than the online solutions or in-person adaptations that are currently taking place [67,68]. In this context, student engagement in the mathematics classroom is seen as major concern by many researchers [69][70][71][72]. As some students indicated in the discussion groups of this research, it is much more difficult for them to follow the explanations and do the proposed exercises and problems now that there are COVID-19 restrictions in the classrooms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to acknowledge that this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, and that as such it captured educators' needs at a unique moment in time. However, even though we acknowledge that the pandemic forced many teachers to suddenly learn and implement a range of new technologies and associated approaches to teaching (e.g., Anderson & Hira, 2020;König et al, 2020;Phillips & Cain, 2020;Rasmitadila et al, 2020;Roman et al, 2022;Trust & Whalen, 2021;Wagner, 2022;Yang et al, 2022), our study did not focus on changes in PD experiences and preferences teachers in Utah might have experienced as a result of pandemic-related experiences. Future research should examine how this unique moment in time affected teachers' attitude towards technology PD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the positive side, the pandemic caused a unique moment in time, when all teachers were learning so much technology that they reported having ten-hour-long work days (Dean & Wimmer, 2020). Such intensive exposure to technology inspired many teachers to learn or deepen their knowledge of many technology tools (e.g., Anderson & Hira, 2020;König et al, 2020;Phillips & Cain, 2020;Rasmitadila et al, 2020;Roman et al, 2022;Trust & Whalen, 2021;Wagner, 2022;Yang et al, 2022), which in turn changed their attitude towards and willingness to play with technology (Schwartz, 2020). As a response to this historical event, we conducted a study to examine how teachers' approach to technology changed (Cain et al, 2022;Pantic et al, n.d.), and found that teachers were more open to using technology, videoconferencing and digital platforms for presenting content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the very setting of teaching has changed, as schools shifted from face-to-face to remote teaching; this impacted the ways by which teachers could collect data about their students, as well as teachers' need to re-evaluate pedagogical decisions to support their students (Usher et al, 2021). Second, the emergency situation has emphasized the affective aspects of learning, which may have impacted teachers' very decisions, as well as the types of data required to support these decisions (Roman et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2021). That is, the very setting of emergency remote teaching may have influenced teachers' DDDM dramatically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%