2022
DOI: 10.1177/02761467221127878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing the Cause-Related Marketing Paradox for Luxury Brands to Increase Prosocial Behavior and Well-Being

Abstract: Although luxury firms have come under increasing pressure to engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives, they have traditionally been hesitant to engage because of the CSR–luxury paradox: the values and motivations underlying luxury consumption (self-enhancement) may conflict with the values and motivations underlying prosocial behavior (self-transcendence), and thus their CSR initiatives may not only be ineffective, they may actually harm the brand. In this commentary, we discuss research on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation is created by tensions resulting from value conflicts, which can harm a brand's performance and participation in CSR and its potential positive effects on the well-being of society. Kim, Park, and Shrum (2022) research advances existing studies focusing on the in(compatibility) between luxury and sustainable initiatives (Dean 2018) by recommending certain types of CSR campaigns that may be more effective because they reduce the tensions created by the CSR-luxury paradox.…”
Section: Beyond Sustainable and Ethical Luxury: A Tlr Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This situation is created by tensions resulting from value conflicts, which can harm a brand's performance and participation in CSR and its potential positive effects on the well-being of society. Kim, Park, and Shrum (2022) research advances existing studies focusing on the in(compatibility) between luxury and sustainable initiatives (Dean 2018) by recommending certain types of CSR campaigns that may be more effective because they reduce the tensions created by the CSR-luxury paradox.…”
Section: Beyond Sustainable and Ethical Luxury: A Tlr Approachmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Aligned with a critical view of luxury, Kim, Park, and Shrum (2022) investigated the paradox of CSR implementation in the luxury sector and the impact of prosocial causes on societal well-being. This work draws on the transformative consumer research literature and supports a vision of a new sustainable and CSR-luxury implementation from a TLR perspective so as to increase well-being.…”
Section: Beyond Sustainable and Ethical Luxury: A Tlr Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent years, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has taken a higher profile in the conduct of firms in the marketplace (Kim, Park, and Shrum 2022), As Peterson et al (2021) proposed, consumers should favor benevolent actions of businesses. Accordingly, consumers with higher attitudes toward business benevolence should indicate more support for sustainable business.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical work in this space has uncovered counterintuitive findings, positing that luxury and sustainability can be compatible and share common goals (Chen and Petersen 2022; Pai, Laverie, and Hass 2022), despite historic criticisms regarding materialism and waste as by-products of luxury. In a similar vein, burgeoning TLR work has considered how luxury brands can align luxury consumer values with CSR and prosocial values, defying the CSR–luxury paradox (Kim, Park, and Shrum 2022). This commentary addresses the role of rituals and rites of passage in the TLR space, identifying key intersections of luxury, rituals, and well-being, as well as proposing avenues for future research.…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%