2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-009-9271-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing the greediness phenomenon in Nonlinear Programming by means of Proximal Augmented Lagrangians

Abstract: Nonlinear programming, Greediness, Augmented Lagrangian method, Regularization,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 and 7a evidences that non-linear programming methods in the first iterations may preferentially seek better values of the objective function over feasibility. This behaviour is described in the literature as the voracity in reducing the objective function magnitude, which has already been reported in [36] for the ALM method, but considering the dimension of the networks treated in scenario A and such characteristic did not affect the convergence of the method herein. However, we can highlight that ALM demanded a greater number of iterations to achieve convergence when compared to the SQP method.…”
Section: Power Assignment Optimisation (Scenario A)supporting
confidence: 61%
“…6 and 7a evidences that non-linear programming methods in the first iterations may preferentially seek better values of the objective function over feasibility. This behaviour is described in the literature as the voracity in reducing the objective function magnitude, which has already been reported in [36] for the ALM method, but considering the dimension of the networks treated in scenario A and such characteristic did not affect the convergence of the method herein. However, we can highlight that ALM demanded a greater number of iterations to achieve convergence when compared to the SQP method.…”
Section: Power Assignment Optimisation (Scenario A)supporting
confidence: 61%
“…But, by the inertia correction procedure, the identity (12), and the Sylvester Law of Inertia, we have that…”
Section: If a Limit Point Of {Xmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The considered set of 283 problems from the CUTEst collection includes 45 problems (representing 16% of the problems) that are quadratic programming reformulations of linear complementarity problems (provided by Michael Ferris). In 11 out of this 45 problems, SECO presented a phenomenon named greediness in [12,10] that may affect penalty and Lagrangian methods when the objective function takes very low values (perhaps going to −∞) in the non-feasible region. In this case, iterates of the subproblems' solver may be attracted by undesired minimizers, especially at the first outer iterations, and overall convergence may fail to occur.…”
Section: Problems With Equality Constraints and Bound Constraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In greedy cases, the step restriction avoids jumps in the direction of unconstrained undesired minimizers. The trust-region restriction is more effective than the proximal strategy of [1] because it tends to definitely exclude the unconstrained minimum from the domain.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%