Addressing the Horizontal Gender Division of Labor: A Case Study of Support and Obstacles in a Heavy Industry Plant in Iceland

Abstract

In the present article, we analyze a project in a heavy industry plant in Iceland in which the management aims to hire an equal number of women and men and, thereby, to work against the gender segregation of work. For their efforts, called the 50/50 strategy, the plant has received national and international awards. Observations and semi-structured interviews were conducted during five visits to the plant, including 85 interviews with 72 individuals, 49 women and 23 men. We found extensive support for the policy. The managers saw business opportunities in it, but although the employees supported the policy because it was seen as fair and modern, they doubted that achieving equal gender representation would be possible. The main emphasis so far has been on designing work organization and equipment, advertising the policy, presenting job opportunities to women outside the plant, and encouraging both genders to acquire the Bright^education. Why the 50/50 target has not been reached lies partly in gender stereotypes outside the plant. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the next steps should be to challenge an alleged male working-culture within the plant. If they fail to do so, their efforts to eliminate horizontal gender segregation are unlikely to succeed and may even become counterproductive.

Occupational Segregation Based on Gender and Wage Inequality by Education, Age and Mobility (South Sumatra, Indonesia)

“…This is also evidenced by Emerek et al (2003) who found that there was a positive difference between the level of women's employment and the segregation of occupations (for example, a relatively lower rate of gender segregation by occupations is characterized by lower employment rates for women). The results of this study contrast with that of Rafnsdóttir & Weigt (2019) who found that the integration of women and men is the same in the labor market because integration is determined by aspects of education and job risks.…”

“This Would Never be Possible if Not for Our Team Play”: An Analysis of Icelandic Doctorate Earnings from a Gender Perspective

“…The theory of compensating wage differential suggests that the motherhood penalty can be explained by mothers' need to seek out jobs that make it easier to combine familial and household obligations (Gough & Noonan, 2013;Napari, 2010). This theory may then explain why, in countries with extensive family-friendly policies and extensive female labor participation, such as the Nordic countries, the labor markets remain highly gendersegregated, with women being underrepresented in supervisory positions and overrepresented in part-time positions (Barone, 2011;Mandel & Semyonov, 2005;Rafnsdóttir & Weigt, 2019;Ridgeway, 2009).…”

Contradicting challenges: the complexity of documenting personal information in a regulatory environment

“…In addition, there are only two female CEOs in Icelandic pension funds (Asta Dis Oladottir et al, 2019). A recent study conducted in a heavy industry plant in Iceland showed that despite managerial support for a 50/50 gender policy, the interviewees thought the policy was unrealistic and ultimately would not succeed (Rafnsdottir and Weigt, 2019). Studies have also revealed that despite the alleged Icelandic gender paradise, female managers are stuck with additional jobs caring for the young, sick and the elderly much more than their male colleagues (Juliusdottir et al, 2018).…”