2020
DOI: 10.1787/afede7d6-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing the social consequences of tariffs for water supply and sanitation

Abstract: Addressing the social consequences of tariffs for water supply and sanitation-Environment Working Paper No. 166 By Xavier Leflaive (1), Marit Hjort (2) (1) OECD Environment Directorate (2) OECD Environment Directorate (at the time of drafting; then UNDP) OECD Working Papers should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or its member countries. The opinions expressed and arguments employed are those of the authors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimating price elasticities under different tariff structures, including nonlinear ones, has important policy implications, mainly in the design of water-pricing schemes. Academics, authorities, and water utility managers try to predict the impact of different tariff structures on water consumption and multiple opposite tariff goals (Fuente, 2019;Klassert et al, 2018;Leflaive & Hjort, 2020;Nauges & Whittington, 2017;Renzetti et al, 2015; Water Resources Research 10.1029/2022WR033508 Rinaudo et al, 2012;Smith & Al-Maskati, 2007;Thrikawala et al, 2008). Authors use the estimated parameters of water demand functions and the price elasticity of demand as inputs in their evaluations; therefore, they need reliable estimates that consider the nonlinearities of the rates.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimating price elasticities under different tariff structures, including nonlinear ones, has important policy implications, mainly in the design of water-pricing schemes. Academics, authorities, and water utility managers try to predict the impact of different tariff structures on water consumption and multiple opposite tariff goals (Fuente, 2019;Klassert et al, 2018;Leflaive & Hjort, 2020;Nauges & Whittington, 2017;Renzetti et al, 2015; Water Resources Research 10.1029/2022WR033508 Rinaudo et al, 2012;Smith & Al-Maskati, 2007;Thrikawala et al, 2008). Authors use the estimated parameters of water demand functions and the price elasticity of demand as inputs in their evaluations; therefore, they need reliable estimates that consider the nonlinearities of the rates.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors use the estimated parameters of water demand functions and the price elasticity of demand as inputs in their evaluations; therefore, they need reliable estimates that consider the nonlinearities of the rates. Furthermore, using nonlinear structures, particularly IBT, has become common worldwide (Leflaive & Hjort, 2020;Whittington & Nauges, 2020).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the construction of centralized wastewater systems in these settlements may not be possible and individual solutions may be required in such settlements. component will deal with the rural water supply and sanitation enhancement for the self-supplied communities (KfW, 2023 [9]).…”
Section: Formalising Service Access and Regulating Service Delivery T...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some countries (such as Mongolia, Viet Nam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Bangladesh) affordability concerns may act as a constraint on tariff increases. However, instead of acting as a barrier to tariff increases, affordability concerns can be (and are best) addressed outside of the water bill, through welldesigned and targeted social measures (Leflaive, Hjort, 2020). These may take the form of cross-subsidies across water users or territories (from urban to rural areas).…”
Section: Ensure Tariffs For Water Services Reflect the Costs Of Servimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experience with sophisticated tariff structures, such as increasing block tariffs, has been less successful. They require a lot of information, which may not be available, and can end up being regressive, often benefitting higher income households that can afford water-efficient appliances and to pay more for water services, while disadvantaging the poor or vulnerable groups that may reside in crowded households (Leflaive, Hjort, 2020).…”
Section: Ensure Tariffs For Water Services Reflect the Costs Of Servimentioning
confidence: 99%