1995
DOI: 10.1093/screen/36.4.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Addressing the spectator of a 'third world' national cinema: the Bombay 'social' film of the 1940s and 1950s

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As specialized, live interfaces with film in a time of what Reiss (2013) calls "digital overabundance," film festivals can come as close as audiences can get to the rarefied experience of an "original" work of art in an age of digital reproduction (Benjamin 1968). 1 In the Indian context, this auratic encounter takes on culturally distinct resonances because of the ways in which film viewing has been conceptualized as taking on a "darshanic" quality, evoking a devotional encounter between viewer and screen (Vasudevan 1995;Rangan 2010). Film festivals, because they concentrate viewing in time and space, intensify this "spiritual" dimension of film viewing.…”
Section: Film Festivals and The Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As specialized, live interfaces with film in a time of what Reiss (2013) calls "digital overabundance," film festivals can come as close as audiences can get to the rarefied experience of an "original" work of art in an age of digital reproduction (Benjamin 1968). 1 In the Indian context, this auratic encounter takes on culturally distinct resonances because of the ways in which film viewing has been conceptualized as taking on a "darshanic" quality, evoking a devotional encounter between viewer and screen (Vasudevan 1995;Rangan 2010). Film festivals, because they concentrate viewing in time and space, intensify this "spiritual" dimension of film viewing.…”
Section: Film Festivals and The Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their divergent production contexts, however, all three films share a cinematic language, answering to corresponding cinematic expectations, which we can label, in a generic fashion, 'Bollywood'. The investment in melodrama (Vasudevan 1995(Vasudevan , 2002 and the interruption of narrative by song and dance sequences (Gopal and Moorti 2005;Gopalan 2002) are key features of this shared language, as is their participation within popular cinema's long-established tradition of using the Kashmir Valley as a space for pastoral escape, metropolitan fantasy, and the blossoming of heterosexual romance (Kabir 2005). Thanks to the 1960s films, the Valley had evolved into a visual register for 'modern love'.…”
Section: Bollywood and Kashmir Kashmir In Bollywoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vasudevan suggests that in Hindi cinema, looking revolves around the exercising of authority through taking or rejecting the look (the deity position), with the woman's look being equivalent to that of the devotee. Both Devdas (1955) and Pyaasa contain sequences where the woman's look at the man is presented as engaging in darsan, with the employment of continuity editing, iconicity and the tableau, together with devotional music and lamps, constructing the hero as a divine image (Vasudevan, 1995). There is also a beach scene in Awara, where the woman's desiring look at the man is coded in a similar fashion.…”
Section: The Indian Cinema Of the 1950'smentioning
confidence: 99%