1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-2614(99)01013-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenine⋯2,4-difluorotoluene (modified base) pair: potential and free-energy surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The base‐pairing energy Δ E (at 0 K) for AF (−3.0 kcal mol −1 ) is about four‐times smaller than for AT (−13.0 kcal mol −1 ) and that the hydrogen bonds in AF are 0.4–0.6 Å longer than in AT (Scheme ), in good agreement with other theoretical studies 3e,3g. These results raise a number of questions: 1) is F really an isoster of T if it leads to such enormous changes in the geometry relative to the Watson–Crick pair?…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The base‐pairing energy Δ E (at 0 K) for AF (−3.0 kcal mol −1 ) is about four‐times smaller than for AT (−13.0 kcal mol −1 ) and that the hydrogen bonds in AF are 0.4–0.6 Å longer than in AT (Scheme ), in good agreement with other theoretical studies 3e,3g. These results raise a number of questions: 1) is F really an isoster of T if it leads to such enormous changes in the geometry relative to the Watson–Crick pair?…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…First, individual base pairs were studied (uracil dimer 143 , the adenine...2,4-difluorotoluene pair 144 , methyluracil dimers 145 , the adenine...thymine pair 146 and the methyladenine...methylthymine pair 147 ), and, later, all the DNA base pairs and methylated DNA base pairs were also considered 148 .…”
Section: Nucleic Acid Base Pairsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a well‐established procedure,14, 17, 20, 28–31 all possible minima in the intermolecular PES of the TRP‐PHE, TRP‐TYR, PHE‐TYR, and TYR‐TYR complexes were determined by quenching 4000 structures regularly sampled from a MD simulation (4 ns for each pair) at 300 K of the two molecules in a cubic box of 25 Å side length with minimum image convention and interacting through the AMBER force field 34. The conjugate gradient method35 was used for minimization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies started with the case of TRP‐HIS pair in gas phase14 and in various solvents,15 continued with the toluene (PHE) homo‐dimer,17 and has been extended in the present study to all the other relevant aromatic amino acid residues pairs: TRP‐PHE, TRP‐TYR, PHE‐TYR, and TYR‐TYR (where TYR stands for tyrosine), excluding only the very uncommon TRP‐TRP pair† and the pairs involving HIS, which is generally considered as a special aromatic residue 22. The PES for each pair is determined with a well‐established14, 17, 20, 28–31 mixed classical/ab initio method, in which the PES is scanned by using classical MD simulation and minimum geometries are searched by quenching many randomly selected and uncorrelated phase space points taken from the MD trajectory. The binding energies at the quenched minimum structures are determined by using MP2 calculations corrected by the basis set superposition error (BSSE) 32.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%