2002
DOI: 10.1093/hmg/11.7.733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adeno-associated virus vector gene transfer and sarcolemmal expression of a 144 kDa micro-dystrophin effectively restores the dystrophin-associated protein complex and inhibits myofibre degeneration in nude/mdx mice

Abstract: Duchenne muscular dystrophy is a severe life-threatening X-linked recessive disorder, caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene, for which currently there is no effective treatment. Because of the large size of the dystrophin cDNA (14 kb) this precluded it from being used in early adenovirus- or retrovirus-based gene therapy vectors. However, some therapeutic success has been achieved in mdx mice using adenovirus- and retrovirus-mediated transfer of a 6.3 kb recombinant mini-dystrophin cDNA. Despite this, pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our laboratory and others have previously reported that AAV vector-mediated delivery of mini-or microdystrophins of human origin was effective and functional in improving muscle pathology and protected myofiber membrane integrity in the mdx mouse model. 4,[6][7][8][9] Although readily available and widely used, the mdx as a small rodent model has numerous limitations. The GRMD dog model, on the other hand, offers many advantages that the mdx mice lack, mainly the pathological similarity to those of DMD human patients, and a larger body mass for more accurate assessment of therapeutic vector dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our laboratory and others have previously reported that AAV vector-mediated delivery of mini-or microdystrophins of human origin was effective and functional in improving muscle pathology and protected myofiber membrane integrity in the mdx mouse model. 4,[6][7][8][9] Although readily available and widely used, the mdx as a small rodent model has numerous limitations. The GRMD dog model, on the other hand, offers many advantages that the mdx mice lack, mainly the pathological similarity to those of DMD human patients, and a larger body mass for more accurate assessment of therapeutic vector dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations are in agreement with our previous human minidystrophin study 4 and studies from others. [6][7][8][9] Canine minidystrophin protects myofiber membrane integrity Plasma membrane damage and leakage in dystrophic muscle tissue is a major pathological cause in DMD patients. The dystrophic muscle cell membranes become damaged and leaky during contraction and relaxation.…”
Section: Canine Minidystrophin Prevents and Ameliorates Muscle Histopmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We and others have tried to design a short but functional microdystrophin gene that could be utilized as the therapeutic tool for DMD. [3][4][5][6] We constructed a series of rod-truncated microdystrophin cDNAs, 3 and generated transgenic mdx mice expressing each microdystrophin, and demonstrated that microdystrophin CS1 with four rod repeats and three hinges was a good candidate for therapeutic molecule. 7 We have also showed that the muscle-specific muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter in a rAAV drives longer transgene expression than the ubiquitous cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter in mdx muscle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For dystrophin, this has been carried out in the form of micro-dystrophin or of a modified U7 snRNA carrying an antisense sequence aimed at restoring the translational frame by inducing exon skipping and, for sarcoglycans, in the form of a normal version of the corresponding cDNA. [20][21][22][23][24][25] Before a therapeutic strategy can be implemented in a clinical trial, it is necessary to obtain objective indicators of therapeutic efficacy, especially since the approaches tested may have different outcomes and may correct some but not necessarily all the pathophysiological parameters. In the case of dystrophin or sarcoglycan deficiencies, a therapeutical benefit can be characterized by the restoration of the DGC at the sarcolemma, a correction of the dystrophic muscle histopathology or recovery of membrane integrity, and eventually by an increase in specific force and a decreased susceptibility to contraction-induced injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%