2013
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenoma, advanced adenoma and colorectal cancer prevalence in asymptomatic 40‐ to 49‐year‐old subjects with a first‐degree family history of colorectal cancer

Abstract: In our population of FDRs of CRC patients, 40-49 years of age, the prevalences of adenoma and advanced adenoma were similar to those observed in older subjects with the same CRC risk. Our data support the current indication to perform screening colonoscopy earlier than 45 years of age in subjects at high CRC risk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The low prevalence of CRC cases (0.8%) found in our cohort complicated the estimation of the diagnostic performance of both markers to detect cancer. However, cancer prevalence of 0.65–0.7% has been described by others in familial-risk-screening scenarios ( Del Vecchio Blanco et al , 2013 ; Ng et al , 2013 ). This difficulty is frequently reported in high-risk cohorts evaluating performance of FIT, with no >6/595–20/1682 CRC cases detected ( Rozen et al , 2010 ; Castro et al , 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The low prevalence of CRC cases (0.8%) found in our cohort complicated the estimation of the diagnostic performance of both markers to detect cancer. However, cancer prevalence of 0.65–0.7% has been described by others in familial-risk-screening scenarios ( Del Vecchio Blanco et al , 2013 ; Ng et al , 2013 ). This difficulty is frequently reported in high-risk cohorts evaluating performance of FIT, with no >6/595–20/1682 CRC cases detected ( Rozen et al , 2010 ; Castro et al , 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…One of the limitations of the study is the reduced number of CRC cases, though the 0.8% prevalence corresponds to that observed in other comparable screening cohorts [35][36][37]. A larger number of asymptomatic CRC cases from screening would be desirable not only to confirm the diagnostic capacity, but also to evaluate the performance for detecting distal and proximal tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the measurement of serum NDKA levels in this group was conceived to verify the correct quantification of the molecule using the commercial ELISA assay, and to corroborate the difference in serum NDKA levels between healthy controls and CRC patients evidenced in our previous work by Western blot 29 . In the screening cohort, a small number of CRC patients were also found, corresponding to a prevalence of 0.78% which is expected in a familial-risk screening context (0.65–0.7%) 51 52 . Nevertheless, since the detection of AN is the goal of this type of approach, the total of 57 cases of CRC together with AA seem suitable for the analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%