1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf01345239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenosine A2A receptors inhibit the conductance of NMDA receptor channels in rat neostriatal neurons

Abstract: Whole-cell patch clamp experiments were carried out in rat striatal brain slices. In a subset of striatal neurons (70-80%), NMDA-induced inward currents were inhibited by the adenosine A2A receptor selective agonist CGS 21680. The non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist 8-(p-sulphophenyl)-theophylline and the A2A receptor selective antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine abolished the inhibitory action of CGS 21680. Intracellular GDP-beta-S, which is known to prevent G protein-mediated reactions, also elimin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2A R modulation of NMDAR current at post-synaptic striatal neurons (Norenberg et al 1998), as well as A 2A R heterodimerization and functional interaction with mGlu 5 Rs (Ferre et al 2002), further suggest that striatal A 2A R activity may also modify working memory by modulating striatal glutamatergic signaling. The modification of the striatal function potentially through dopaminergic and/or glutamatergic mechanisms by striatal A 2A Rs might be expected to alter the processing of cortical information entering the striatum, as well as striatal projections to efferent targets such as the prefrontal cortex (Simpson et al 2010).…”
Section: Selective Inactivation Of Striatal Neuronal a 2a Rs Is Suffimentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 2A R modulation of NMDAR current at post-synaptic striatal neurons (Norenberg et al 1998), as well as A 2A R heterodimerization and functional interaction with mGlu 5 Rs (Ferre et al 2002), further suggest that striatal A 2A R activity may also modify working memory by modulating striatal glutamatergic signaling. The modification of the striatal function potentially through dopaminergic and/or glutamatergic mechanisms by striatal A 2A Rs might be expected to alter the processing of cortical information entering the striatum, as well as striatal projections to efferent targets such as the prefrontal cortex (Simpson et al 2010).…”
Section: Selective Inactivation Of Striatal Neuronal a 2a Rs Is Suffimentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They are abundantly expressed in the striatum and are largely found on post-synaptic striatopallidal medium spiny neurons (MSNs) of the "indirect" pathway (e.g., Schiffmann et al 1991a,b;Rosin et al 1998;Rebola et al 2005) where they colocalize and interact with receptors of other neurotransmitter and neuromodulatory systems to influence synaptic plasticity and behavior Wei et al 2011). Specifically, striatal A 2A Rs interact antagonistically with dopamine D 2 receptors (D 2 Rs) (Hillion et al 2002;Canals et al 2003) and oppose N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) function (Norenberg et al 1998;Wirkner et al 2000;Gerevich et al 2002). In contrast, striatal A 2A Rs may also interact synergistically with metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors (mGlu 5 Rs) (Ferre et al 2002;Kachroo et al 2005) and cannabinoid CB1 receptors (CB 1 Rs) (Tebano et al 2009;Lerner et al 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cells, the signaling cascades ignited by these two classes of G proteins have opposed actions [30][31][32][33][34]. Therefore, an implicit hypothesis predicts that the signaling cascades that control Ca 2+ -currents and excitability via A 1 -and A 2A -receptors would have a push-pull kind of effects: One would decrease and the other would increase the activity of many final effectors in cells expressing both receptors [12,32,33,[35][36][37]. However, to our knowledge, the modulatory actions of both adenosine receptors on Ca 2+ -currents, expressed by the same SPNs, have not been described.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 -22 Finally, it is noteworthy that in rat neostriatal neurons, activation of A 2A receptors has been shown to inhibit the conductance of N-methyl-daspartate (NMDA) receptors through an intracellular pathway. 23,24 Therefore, a similar mechanism in the spinal cord could be relevant in regard to the involvement of the NMDA receptors in pain pathways. Indeed, the plastic phenomenon called wind-up is related to the activation of NMDA receptors and is responsible for the development of hyperalgesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%