Water and Sanitation for the 21st Century: Health and Microbiological Aspects of Excreta and Wastewater Management (Global Wate 2019
DOI: 10.14321/waterpathogens.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adenoviruses

Abstract: The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(165 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such variability hampers NoV detection in the environment and its application as an MST marker, another disadvantage being its presence in pig feces in some areas in this study. The mean of HAdV in raw sewage (5.13 log 10 GC/10 ml) was found to be higher than in other studies (about 3–4 log 10 GC/1,000 ml; Hewitt et al, 2013 ; Rusiñol et al, 2014 ; Haramoto et al, 2015 ), although a considerable variability (2–7 log 10 GC/10 ml) between geographical areas has also been observed ( Allard and Vantarakis, 2017 ). As a marker, HAdV showed good specificity for human source detection, being found mainly in human fecal samples, but its low sensitivity limits its use for MST unless combined with more sensitive markers ( Blanch et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Such variability hampers NoV detection in the environment and its application as an MST marker, another disadvantage being its presence in pig feces in some areas in this study. The mean of HAdV in raw sewage (5.13 log 10 GC/10 ml) was found to be higher than in other studies (about 3–4 log 10 GC/1,000 ml; Hewitt et al, 2013 ; Rusiñol et al, 2014 ; Haramoto et al, 2015 ), although a considerable variability (2–7 log 10 GC/10 ml) between geographical areas has also been observed ( Allard and Vantarakis, 2017 ). As a marker, HAdV showed good specificity for human source detection, being found mainly in human fecal samples, but its low sensitivity limits its use for MST unless combined with more sensitive markers ( Blanch et al, 2006 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Overall, the types are divided into seven species (A to G) that infect humans, causing a wide range of clinical symptoms, such as upper respiratory tract syndromes (pharyngitis, rhinitis and also pneumonia), gastroenteritis, kerato-conjunctivitis and urinary diseases. HAdVs are also responsible for a large number of asymptomatic infections, which would explain the worldwide distribution of the virus [ 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main route of transmission is by the inhalation of aerosolized droplets and fecal–oral exposure, since HAdV can be excreted in high levels in stool specimens [ 12 ]. Giving the combination of fecal elimination and a relatively high degree of resistance to water disinfection, HAdV has been detected worldwide in various water environments, from wastewaters at various stages of treatment to surface waters (i.e., recreational waters) and tap waters [ 13 ]. HAdV has also shown a high frequency and abundance in water environments compared to other enteric, nonenveloped viruses (i.e., norovirus, enterovirus) [ 14 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, in order to perform a reliable occupational biological risk assessment, we developed a probabilistic QMRA model for the exposure of workers to bioaerosols containing HAdV using a dose–response model recently developed to describe the distributions of infectivity and pathogenicity in various challenge studies incorporating differences in inoculation routes [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%