1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)81074-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adequacy of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis: Morbidity and Mortality in Chronic Peritoneal Dialysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Borrowing terminology from epidemiology (21), this likely reflects a “detection bias” phenomenon that, in the context of the current investigation, would involve changes in the rate of event detection (rather than rate occurrence, per se ) over calendar time. As a result of increased research and discussion with respect to PD adequacy in the late 1980s and early 1990s (22-26), nephrologists might have been more likely to identify CAPD patients as being inadequately dialyzed, due to heightened awareness. As emphasized by Teehan et al (24) and Hakim (26), analyses of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (27-29) reveal that gross underdialysis of HD patients went unrecognized by the onsite investigators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Borrowing terminology from epidemiology (21), this likely reflects a “detection bias” phenomenon that, in the context of the current investigation, would involve changes in the rate of event detection (rather than rate occurrence, per se ) over calendar time. As a result of increased research and discussion with respect to PD adequacy in the late 1980s and early 1990s (22-26), nephrologists might have been more likely to identify CAPD patients as being inadequately dialyzed, due to heightened awareness. As emphasized by Teehan et al (24) and Hakim (26), analyses of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (27-29) reveal that gross underdialysis of HD patients went unrecognized by the onsite investigators.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might explain why ADEMEX failed to find a difference in outcome between patients with and without adequate dialysis according to the DOQI guidelines (31). A variety of other single‐center experiences did not show increases in mortality until delivered Kt / V was less than 1.9 (32), 1.85 (18), 1.7 (33), or 1.5 (34). Many nephrologists remain convinced that the adequacy targets posed by DOQI are too high, and that “adequate dialysis” is present as long as Kt / V urea is greater than 1.7/week, unless other clinical or biochemical signs of inadequate dialysis are present (35).…”
Section: Solute Removal In Anuric Patientsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A similar situation might exist for PD. Peritoneal dialysis dose appears to be an important independent correlate of morbidity and mortality until wKt/V exceeds some nominal value (1.7, 1.96, 2.0, or 2.1) (7,28,33,69), at which time nCAR and body size may become more valuable indicators of morbidity and mortality risk (24,70).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%