2000
DOI: 10.1067/mhj.2000.109920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adequacy of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal coronary hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
57
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Unknown factors, including individual variability in Ado dose-responses or the microvascular effects of individual risk conditions, could potentially affect CFVR Ado . While similar doses of intracoronary Ado provide near-maximal increase in coronary flow in 90-92% of cases, 28 the 18 mcg dose may not have achieved maximal hyperemia in every patient. 29 Also, no systematic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy was undertaken.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unknown factors, including individual variability in Ado dose-responses or the microvascular effects of individual risk conditions, could potentially affect CFVR Ado . While similar doses of intracoronary Ado provide near-maximal increase in coronary flow in 90-92% of cases, 28 the 18 mcg dose may not have achieved maximal hyperemia in every patient. 29 Also, no systematic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy was undertaken.…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 The reasons include avoiding the need for additional femoral punctures or infusion pumps, increased cost efficiencies and lower incidence of side-effects. 24 Intracoronary dosing may avoid hemodynamic confounding because central aortic pressure is less likely to change, 21 even when intracoronary infusions are used. 25 Although classification agreement is good across a wide spectrum of stenoses, 24 in more clinical populations the classification match between intracoronary and intravenous dosing can fall to 78%, near the 0.80 threshold.…”
Section: Altering the Doses Of Hyperemic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Intracoronary dosing may avoid hemodynamic confounding because central aortic pressure is less likely to change, 21 even when intracoronary infusions are used. 25 Although classification agreement is good across a wide spectrum of stenoses, 24 in more clinical populations the classification match between intracoronary and intravenous dosing can fall to 78%, near the 0.80 threshold. 14 Therefore, Current Developments in Pressure-Only Indices…”
Section: Altering the Doses Of Hyperemic Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This glycocalyx insensitivity should be taken into account when using adenosine-induced coronary hyperemia as a marker for vasodilating capacity to an ischemic stimulus. coronary circulation; hyaluronidase; dogs TO ASSESS the functional severity of coronary stenoses in the clinic, use of adenosine for inducing maximal coronary hyperemia in patients has been well established (8,10,17,34). Clinical decision-making to intervene is based on intracoronary parameters that are derived during hyperemia, and it is therefore critical that the adenosine-induced hyperemia accurately reflects the coronary hyperemia that can be attained by endogenous stimuli (7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%