College Students With ADHD 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5345-1_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ADHD in Adolescents (Middle and High School)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 269 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For inclusion in the study, adolescents had to meet the following criteria: (1) a prior DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD [28] by a child psychiatrist or certified psychologist, (2) a confirmed ADHD diagnosis on the ADHD sections of the diagnostic interview schedule for children for DSM-IV parent version (DISC-IV) [29]. The DISC-IV is a structured diagnostic interview based on DSM-IV, which establishes ADHD group membership based on a diagnostic algorithm, including a check for the presence of cross-situational impairment, (3) between 12 and 17 years old, (4) attending secondary school, (5) sufficient understanding of the Dutch language (adolescents and parents), (6) a full scale IQ (FSIQ) >80 measured by the short version of the Dutch Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III) [30], (7) in case the adolescent already received pharmacological treatment for ADHD, it had to be stable for 4 weeks prior to pre-testing. Adolescents were requested not to change medication status and dose between pre-and post-assessment.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For inclusion in the study, adolescents had to meet the following criteria: (1) a prior DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of ADHD [28] by a child psychiatrist or certified psychologist, (2) a confirmed ADHD diagnosis on the ADHD sections of the diagnostic interview schedule for children for DSM-IV parent version (DISC-IV) [29]. The DISC-IV is a structured diagnostic interview based on DSM-IV, which establishes ADHD group membership based on a diagnostic algorithm, including a check for the presence of cross-situational impairment, (3) between 12 and 17 years old, (4) attending secondary school, (5) sufficient understanding of the Dutch language (adolescents and parents), (6) a full scale IQ (FSIQ) >80 measured by the short version of the Dutch Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-III) [30], (7) in case the adolescent already received pharmacological treatment for ADHD, it had to be stable for 4 weeks prior to pre-testing. Adolescents were requested not to change medication status and dose between pre-and post-assessment.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…whenever the adolescent was not motivated enough to finish a session, MI was conducted by discussing pros and cons of treatment until the adolescent indicated to have enough motivation for the treatment to continue, (7) in the attitude of the therapist: therapists were learned to use MI by emphasizing the autonomy of the adolescent, collaborate with them rather than taking an expert role, evoke and elicit reasons and concerns about change instead of imparting advise and, finally, to show empathy in a MI manner [51]. A final similarity between both treatments was that adolescents could earn a reward, which they got from their parents (e.g., doing an activity with their friends or family, choosing desert for a week or getting a present), when they attended all treatment sessions.…”
Section: Similaritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation