2000
DOI: 10.1128/iai.68.9.4865-4871.2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence ofStaphylococcus aureusto Endothelial Cells: Influence of Capsular Polysaccharide, Global Regulatoragr, and Bacterial Growth Phase

Abstract: The adherence of Staphylococcus aureus to human endothelial cells (EC) is probably an important step in the pathogenesis of systemic staphylococcal infections. We examined the influence of type 5 capsular polysaccharide (CP5) production, the global regulator agr, and the bacterial growth phase on S. aureus adherence to EC. Whereas S. aureus Newman showed maximal adherence to EC in the logarithmic phase of growth, an isogenic agr mutant showed maximal adherence in the stationary growth phase. S. aureus adherenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

14
99
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(45 reference statements)
14
99
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the surface polysaccharide operon codes for capsular (membrane-associated) rather than excreted exopolysaccharides, shielding of adhesion factors by capsular polysaccharides could explain our findings. Such shielding has also been observed in S. aureus and might explain our observations, with respect to the reduced glass adherence of the lamA mutant (43). Finally, there are reports on surface characteristics being dependent on the relative levels of expression of different lipopolysaccharides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which influence adherence properties to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…If the surface polysaccharide operon codes for capsular (membrane-associated) rather than excreted exopolysaccharides, shielding of adhesion factors by capsular polysaccharides could explain our findings. Such shielding has also been observed in S. aureus and might explain our observations, with respect to the reduced glass adherence of the lamA mutant (43). Finally, there are reports on surface characteristics being dependent on the relative levels of expression of different lipopolysaccharides in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which influence adherence properties to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…However, for the same reason, it can also mask other surface components required for staphylococcal pathogenesis. Indeed, it has been shown that capsule impedes the initial attachment of S. aureus to endothelial cells by masking the adhesins (Pohlmann-Dietze, 2000). Thus, the organism needs to regulate capsule production according to requirements at various stages of the infection process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcription of the fnb genes is restricted to the early exponential phase of growth (19) under the control of Agr and SarA (23,24). Fibronectin binding activity is lost as cultures enter stationary phase due to degradation of both FnBPA and FnBPB by V8 serine protease (25) and masking of the proteins by capsular polysaccharide (26). The A domains of FnBPA and FnBPB are 45% identical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%