2010
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-10-304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to cancer screening guidelines across Canadian provinces: an observational study

Abstract: BackgroundCancer screening guidelines reflect the costs and benefits of population-based screening based on evidence from clinical trials. While most of the existing literature on compliance with cancer screening guidelines only measures raw screening rates in the target age groups, we used a novel approach to estimate degree of guideline compliance across Canadian provinces for breast, colorectal and prostate cancer screening. Measuring compliance as the change in age-specific screening rates at the guideline… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other organizations at the time the data was collected, such as the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded that the evidence was insufficient to recommend PSA screening for prostate cancer in men over 50 years of age [4,19]. Two studies have suggested that looking at the age group just before guideline cut off is an appropriate way to monitor screening guideline compliance and note that there should be little to no testing in the age groups preceding the cut off age [20,21]. Our finding that there is testing occurring in younger men suggests that official guidelines at the time were not being followed in many instances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, other organizations at the time the data was collected, such as the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force concluded that the evidence was insufficient to recommend PSA screening for prostate cancer in men over 50 years of age [4,19]. Two studies have suggested that looking at the age group just before guideline cut off is an appropriate way to monitor screening guideline compliance and note that there should be little to no testing in the age groups preceding the cut off age [20,21]. Our finding that there is testing occurring in younger men suggests that official guidelines at the time were not being followed in many instances.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Up-to-date CRC screening for patients at average risk has been reported at less than 20 % in several studies across Canada (Strumpf et al 2010;Zarychanski et al 2007). Data from the 2008 Canadian Community Health Survey showed that 32 % (range 16-47 %) of Canadians aged 50-74 reported being screened with either FOBT in the previous 2 years or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy in the previous 5 years (Canadian Cancer Society et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prostate cancer screening guidelines exist at the national level; however, most individual provinces do not have asymptomatic screening programs for this malignancy [ 3 ]. To illustrate, the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care and the Canadian Cancer Society published guidelines for asymptomatic prostate cancer screening in 1994 and 2000, respectively [ 3 , 4 , 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prostate cancer screening guidelines exist at the national level; however, most individual provinces do not have asymptomatic screening programs for this malignancy [ 3 ]. To illustrate, the Canadian Task Force on Preventative Health Care and the Canadian Cancer Society published guidelines for asymptomatic prostate cancer screening in 1994 and 2000, respectively [ 3 , 4 , 5 ]. The former recommends not to order the prostate specific antigen (PSA) test for asymptomatic screening, whereas the latter recommends discussing its risks and benefits with a physician [ 3 , 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation