2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to Drugs That Prevent Cardiovascular Disease: Meta-analysis on 376,162 Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

28
452
9
46

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 685 publications
(535 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
28
452
9
46
Order By: Relevance
“…457 -461 Poor adherence rates are not only limited to statins but are also true of other lipid-lowering drugs and all medications used to prevent CVD, as demonstrated in a systematic review and meta-analysis. 462 The reasons for non-adherence are complex and include misconceptions about tolerability on the part of both patients and professionals alike. These barriers prevent patients from gaining the maximum benefit from their treatment.…”
Section: Adhering To Medicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…457 -461 Poor adherence rates are not only limited to statins but are also true of other lipid-lowering drugs and all medications used to prevent CVD, as demonstrated in a systematic review and meta-analysis. 462 The reasons for non-adherence are complex and include misconceptions about tolerability on the part of both patients and professionals alike. These barriers prevent patients from gaining the maximum benefit from their treatment.…”
Section: Adhering To Medicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adherence seems to be an area where lots can be achieved [4]. It is a big issue not only in treating HT, but also in lipid lowering therapy and aspirin in both primary and secondary prevention [10]. The problem often begins right after leaving the doctor's office.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,23 Conversely, if the true effect of aspirin is much smaller than estimated by Rothwell and colleagues (as suggested by Seshasai and colleagues, who estimated a relative risk of 0.93), 9 then there will be few or no effects on the threshold for net benefit from the mortality effect alone. Our analysis assumed full adherence to aspirin, so as to answer the question of what the effect of regular use would be; however, adherence to preventive medicines is sub-optimal, 29 and we have not included the costs of systematic adherence promotion, so its actual beneficial effects when offered to a population will be smaller (as will its adverse effects).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] Utilities. The utilities for each health state were drawn from the literature and are also shown in Table 1.…”
Section: 22122mentioning
confidence: 99%