2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to hand hygiene in an Italian long-term care facility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
30
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings have been reported from other studies [19,20,29] , which has been attributed to the assumption that nurses are more likely to use hand hygiene to protect themselves rather than the patient [20] , or to avoid transmitting an infection to consecutive patients rather than to infect the first patient [29] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar findings have been reported from other studies [19,20,29] , which has been attributed to the assumption that nurses are more likely to use hand hygiene to protect themselves rather than the patient [20] , or to avoid transmitting an infection to consecutive patients rather than to infect the first patient [29] .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This level of hand hygiene compliance is less than that reported among nursing staff in most European settings [18] ; however, it is higher than that reported in Saudi Arabia [10] , Spain [19] or Italy [20] . While 33% compliance is low, it is likely that the true compliance could be even lower, most probably because of the strict definition of hand hygiene opportunities (only dirty contacts according to the scale devised by Fulkerson) and the inclusive definition for hand hygiene practices (any attempt to practice hand hygiene).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…3 Our results are closer to those of the former study. However, because extraseries opportunities and intraseries opportunities have not been differentiated in preceding studies, it is not easy to compare their adherence rates with those of our study.…”
Section: Rates Of Adherence To Hand Hygiene and Gloving Practices Insupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In observational studies from LTCFs figures have been low, 14.7% 17 and 17.5%. 18 In an intervention study in Hong Kong LCTFs which used pocket containers of alcohol-based hand rub, together with education and posters, the adherence increased from 26% to 33%. 19 a reduction in the incidence of pneumonia was even reported during the same intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%