Adherence to prescription-writing guidelines for outpatients in Southern Gauteng district hospitals

Abstract

Background Medical prescription writing is legally and professionally regulated in order to prevent errors that can result in patients being harmed. This study assesses prescriber adherence to such regulations in primary care settings. Methods A cross-sectional study of 412 prescriptions from four district hospital outpatient departments (OPDs) was conducted in March 2015. Primary outcome data were obtained by scoring prescriptions for accuracy across four categories: completion of essential elements, use of generic names of medications, use of recommended abbreviations and decimals and legibility. Secondary outcome data sought associations between accuracy scores and characteristics of the OPDs that might influence prescriber adherence. Results Completion of the essential elements, including patient identifiers, prescriber identifiers, treatment regimen and date scored 44%, 77%, 99% and 99% respectively. Legibility, the use of generic names of medications and the use of recommended abbreviations and decimals scored 90%, 39% and 35%, respectively. Only 38% of prescriptions achieved a global accuracy score (GAS) of between 80% and 100%. A significant association was found between lower GAS and the number of prescriptions written per day ( p = 0.001) as well as with the number of prescribers working on that day ( p = 0.005), suggesting a negative impact on prescribers’ performance because of workload pressures. Conclusion Low GAS values indicate poor adherence to prescription-writing regulations. Elements requiring substantial improvement include completion of patient and prescriber identifiers, use of generic medication names and the use of recommended abbreviations and decimals. This study provides baseline data for future initiatives for improvement in prescription-writing quality.

Pattern of Prescription Practices in Acute Respiratory Infection and Diarrhoea Cases in Out Patient Department of Tertiary Care Hospitals in West Bengal, India; A Cross Sectional Analysis through Rational Use of Medicine Consensus Approach

“…Higher adherence to guidelines will actually lead to treatment regimen completion possibly because of the institutional culture of emphasizing on the treatment regimen prescription writing. (51) In conclusion, the pattern of prescriptions revealed inappropriate practices in the form of multiple drugs, use of brand names, prescribing xed dose combinations and overuse of antibiotics without any rationale and not adhering to the available guidelines (ICMR, State, WHO). Though the guidelines have overlaps, they are not all the same and also do not include all the possible treatment options creating a scope for physician to depend on his/her experience/expertise.…”

Assessment of private health sector prescribing patterns and adherence to prescription format using World Health Organization core drug use indicators in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

“…[ 59 ] In Pakistan, the name of drug, dose, dosage form, and how to use was mentioned in 100, 88, 97, 97% of prescriptions, respectively [ 52 ]. However, the lower rate of adherence to complete treatment-related information on prescriptions was also reported in South Africa [ 60 ]. Medication errors, drug-related adverse events, and therapeutic failure could occur when medications are dispensed with insufficient labels [ 10 ].…”

Rationality of Prescriptions by Rational Use of Medicine Consensus Approach in Common Respiratory and Gastrointestinal Infections: An Outpatient Department Based Cross-Sectional Study from India

“…A study completed at outpatient clinics in Saudi Arabia reported omissions of various components of the treatment regimen, with some reaching up to 91% incompleteness [ 39 ]. Higher adherence to guidelines will actually lead to treatment regimen completion, possibly because of the institutional culture of emphasising the treatment regimen prescription writing [ 40 ].…”