2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2017.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to standard medication infusion concentrations and its impact on paediatric intensive care patient outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sharing of event log data allowing independent third-party review and system-wide learning NHS England and Department of Health and Social Care Aseptic Services Redesign [9] and regional equivalents [10] To increase manufacturing capacity in the NHS to free up nursing capacity for care, and support work already delivered in standardisation of injectable medicines [11][12][13][14] Standardise intravenous products where possible Global Digital Exemplar (GDE) programme [15] Drive to implement sophisticated electronic medicines administration systems in digitally mature organisations Targeted funding for enhancements and provision of closed loop medication administration systems (e.g. barcode medication verification)…”
Section: Areas Of Discussion At the Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sharing of event log data allowing independent third-party review and system-wide learning NHS England and Department of Health and Social Care Aseptic Services Redesign [9] and regional equivalents [10] To increase manufacturing capacity in the NHS to free up nursing capacity for care, and support work already delivered in standardisation of injectable medicines [11][12][13][14] Standardise intravenous products where possible Global Digital Exemplar (GDE) programme [15] Drive to implement sophisticated electronic medicines administration systems in digitally mature organisations Targeted funding for enhancements and provision of closed loop medication administration systems (e.g. barcode medication verification)…”
Section: Areas Of Discussion At the Symposiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lww.com/JPS/A612). The studies were conducted in the United States (n = 16), [47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] the United Kingdom (n = 7), [63][64][65][66][67][68][69] Australia (n = 3), [70][71][72] Brazil (n = 3), [73][74][75] Spain (n = 3), [76][77][78] Mexico (n = 2), 79,80 Saudi Arabia (n = 2), 81,82 Singapore (n = 2), 83,84 Canada (n = 1), 85 China (n = 1), 86 France (n = 1), 87 Germany (n = 1), 88 Italy (n = 1), 89 Netherlands (n = 1), 90 and Switzerland FIGURE 2. Outline of the narrative review process, analysis of the included articles (n = 63), and comparison to our previous systematic reviews.…”
Section: Description Of Studies Exploring Systemic Defenses To Preven...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 The Institute for Safe Medication Practices as well as the Vermont Oxford Network, therefore, recommend patient-specific drug concentrations to be abolished, making standard concentrations for medication infusions a requirement for hospital accreditation in the United States and Canada. [8][9][10] However, using standardized drug concentrations, fixed ratios between volume rate and dose rate per body weight (by altering the drug concentration relative to the patient's body weight) are no longer achievable. Thus, for the proper interpretation of the actual amount of active substance per body weight, a calculation is required.…”
Section: Background and Significancementioning
confidence: 99%