1982
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290050057011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adherence to Treatment Regimen in a Lithium Carbonate Clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
40
2
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
40
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In literature also it is opined that socio-demographic factors are the least rewarding of the predictors of compliance1. 16,17 Diagnosis of substance abuse did not correlate significantly with nonadherence in our sample. In some studies it has been considered one of the most important reasons for nonadherence (substance abuse seems to be a strong predictor of non-compliance in psychosis 18 while in others it did not play a major role but any definitive conclusion should not be drawn as in our study incidence of substance abuse was 10%, while in others where it has been found significant, the incidence was more than 30%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…In literature also it is opined that socio-demographic factors are the least rewarding of the predictors of compliance1. 16,17 Diagnosis of substance abuse did not correlate significantly with nonadherence in our sample. In some studies it has been considered one of the most important reasons for nonadherence (substance abuse seems to be a strong predictor of non-compliance in psychosis 18 while in others it did not play a major role but any definitive conclusion should not be drawn as in our study incidence of substance abuse was 10%, while in others where it has been found significant, the incidence was more than 30%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Previous attempts to apply HBMs to psychiatric populations have produced inconsistent results [10,11]. This may mean that HBMs are not a useful model for people with severe mental disorders.…”
Section: Scottmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is unclear which of these factors is most important and the data from population studies do not help clinicians predict which individual from an 'at risk' group will become nonadherent. An alternative approach to exploring medication adherence, used extensively in research in other chronic medically ill populations, is to examine health beliefs, factors that influence those beliefs, and the prompts that lead people to engage in certain behaviours [8][9][10][11]. We explored the utility of two Health Belief Models (HBMs) [5,8] in identifying individuals at risk of nonadherence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been found to be predictive of adherence in some studies of the mentally ill (Perkins et al, 2006), research on the applicability of the HBM to bipolar disorder has produced mixed results. That is, scales based on the HBM have correlated only modestly with treatment adherence in bipolar disorder (Cohen, Parikh, & Kennedy, 2000;Connelly, Davenport, & Nurnberger, 1982;Scott, 2002).Another widely researched model of adherence, the self-regulatory model (SRM), was formulated to help explain treatment adherence among the chronically ill (Leventhal, Meyer, & Nerenz, 1980). The SRM, also known as the common sense model, perceives taking medication as a response to the interpretation of threat for the individual, including physical symptoms and recognition of disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it has been found to be predictive of adherence in some studies of the mentally ill (Perkins et al, 2006), research on the applicability of the HBM to bipolar disorder has produced mixed results. That is, scales based on the HBM have correlated only modestly with treatment adherence in bipolar disorder (Cohen, Parikh, & Kennedy, 2000;Connelly, Davenport, & Nurnberger, 1982;Scott, 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%