1995
DOI: 10.1163/156856195x00068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion mechanisms of polyurethanes to glass surfaces. Part II. Phase separation in polyurethanes and its effects on adhesion to glass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). This trend also agrees with the results obtained by Agrawal and Drzal [33], who showed that in an elastomeric system a higher degree of phase separation did not produce better adhesion.…”
Section: Adhesion Propertiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…4). This trend also agrees with the results obtained by Agrawal and Drzal [33], who showed that in an elastomeric system a higher degree of phase separation did not produce better adhesion.…”
Section: Adhesion Propertiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Both types of glass fiber reinforced unhybridized composite samples (G’G’ and GG) exhibited the highest specific flexural modulus compared to both natural fiber reinforced samples ( Figure 6 ). The formation of an interphase region between a glass fiber and a PU matrix allows for the better dispersion and proper wetting of fibers into the matrix leading to better mechanical properties of the composites [ 26 ]. The addition of glass fiber resulted in lowering of modulus in hybridized flax composite samples by 42%, whereas the hybridization of hemp fiber resulted in a 55% improvement in modulus ( p < 0.05), when compared with just hemp fiber reinforced composite samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were unable to determine whether epoxy remained on the substrate surface as previously observed for films on glass [10][11][12] or whether failure occurred along the filmsubstrate interface as observed for this film system on aluminum. [1] However, we used a peel test to remove some films from the aluminized substrates and then examined the substrates using optical microscopy with Nemarski contrast and Attenuated Total Reflectance Spectroscopy.…”
Section: Mechanical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 87%