Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions

Aida, Masahiro; Hayakawa, Tohru; Mizukawa, Kazuhiro

doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80076-9

Cited by 151 publications

(137 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

125

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The formation of siloxane bonds between the silanol (Si-O-CH3) and hydroxyl (-OH) groups of the ceramic surface are initiated and accelerated by acid catalysis. 22 Consequently, the acid component within MAX may not provide the opportunity to enhance the formation of siloxane bonds, resulting in decreased bond strengths compared with PAN and RXU, as observed in the current investigation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

The Effect of Surface Preparation and Luting Agent on Bond Strength to a Zirconium-based Ceramic

Senyilmaz

Palin²,

Shortall³

et al. 2007

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

©Operative Dentistry, 2007, 32-6, 623-630 DP Senyilmaz • WM Palin ACC Shortall • FJT Burke Clinical RelevanceAlthough clinical situations may exist where the adhesive luting of high-density milled ceramics for crown or fixed partial dentures are not required, certain clinical situations, such as the chairside repair of existing ceramic restorations, poor retention or inadequate abutment tooth size, will require a durable adhesive layer between the resin and ceramic. This study investigates the efficacy of modern "self-adhesive" luting cements on a zirconia-based ceramic following various surface preparations SUMMARY Objectives: To investigate the bond strength of modern "self-adhesive" resin cements to a zirconium-based dental ceramic following different surface preparations and storage conditions. Methods: The surface of zirconium-based ceramic discs (12 x 2 mm) were either left untreated, prepared using alumina grit-blasting or tribochemical treatment. Resin composite cylinders were bonded to ceramic specimens using Panavia-F, RelyX Unicem or Maxcem resin cements. The shear bond strength of specimens (n=10) was tested "dry," following 24-hour water immersion or a thermocycling regime.Results: For each surface preparation, a significant reduction in bond strength following 24-hour water immersion and thermocycling compared to "dry" storage conditions was identified for both Panavia-F and Maxcem. However, Unicem specimens exhibited statistically similar SBS values for tribochemically-treated specimens stored dry following 24-hour water immersion or thermocycling (11.7 ± 1.3, 14.1 ± 6.3 and 11.7 ± 4.9 MPa, respectively) (p>0.05). No significant differences in bond strength were identified for Panavia-F or Unicem specimens for any surface preparation following the thermocycling regime (p>0.05). In contrast, for each surface preparation following thermocycling (p<0.001), Maxcem exhibited a significant decrease in SBS Conclusions: The pre-treatment of a zirconiumbased ceramic surface with grit-blasting and tribochemical treatment improves the bond strength of resin cements. Following "wet" storage conditions, Panavia-F and Unicem demonstrated superior bond strength compared with Maxcem. Differences in ceramic surface preparation and the chemistry of resin cements will affect the nature of the bonding mechanism and durability of the adhesive layer.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 62%

The Effect of Surface Preparation and Luting Agent on Bond Strength to a Zirconium-based Ceramic

Senyilmaz

Palin²,

Shortall³

et al. 2007

Operative Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Usually, in order to maintain equal compliances of the specimen halves, i.e. for the two halves to have equal strain energy, most of the interfacial fracture toughness tests require E 1 …”

Section: Bond Strength and Interfacial Fracture Toughness Of Resin/cementioning

confidence: 99%

Characterizing ceramics and the interfacial adhesion to resin: II- the relationship of surface treatment, bond strength, interfacial toughness and fractography

Bona

2005

J. Appl. Oral Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

he clinical success of resin bonding procedures for indirect ceramic restorations and ceramic repairs depends on the quality and durability of the bond between the ceramic and the resin. The quality of this bond will depend upon the bonding mechanisms that are controlled in part by the surface treatment that promote micromechanical and/or chemical bonding to the substrate. The objective of this review is to correlate interfacial toughness (K A ) with fracture surface morphological parameters of the dental ceramic-resin systems as a function of ceramic surface treatment. This analysis is designed to identify mechanisms that promote adhesion of these ceramic-resin systems and an appropriate bond test method to yield relevant adhesion performance data. Uniterms: Ceramics, Resins, Bond strength, Interfacial toughness, Fracture surface. sucesso clínico de procedimentos adesivos para restaurações cerâmicas e reparo destas restaurações depende da qualidade e durabilidade da adesão entre a cerâmica e a resina. A qualidade desta adesão dependerá dos mecanismos adesivos que são controlados em parte pelo tratamento de superfície que promove uma união micro-mecânica e/ou química com o substrato. O objetivo desta revisão é correlacionar a tenacidade de fratura aparente da interface adesiva (K A ) com os parâmetros morfológicos da superfície de fratura de sistemas cerâmica-resina em função do tratamento da superfície cerâmica. Esta análise é desenvolvida para identificar os mecanismos que promovem a adesão nestes sistemas cerâmica-resina e uma metodologia apropriada para testar a resistência adesiva produzindo resultados relevantes da performa adesiva. Unitermos: Cerâmicas; Resinas; Força de adesão; Tenacidade; Superfície de fratura.

show abstract

“…In order to improve adhesion to ceramic materials, various ceramic surface treatments have been developed. Mechanical roughening with a coarse diamond bur 12) , air-abrasion using alumina particles 13) , and chemical etching with hydrofluoric acid 14) have been shown to provide micromechanical interlocking at the ceramic-resin interface. Moreover, it has been reported that the applications of silane coupling agent and acidic functional monomer could produce chemical bonding to silica-based and zirconia ceramic materials [15][16][17] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of five kinds of surface treatment agents on the bond strength to various ceramics with thermocycle aging

Noda

Nakajima

Takahashi

et al. 2017

Dental Materials Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study evaluated the effects of ceramic surface treatment agents on shear bond strengths to ceramic materials with and without thermocycling. Ceramic plates were prepared from feldspathic ceramic; AAA, lithium disilicate ceramic material; IPS e.max Press, zirconia ceramic; Lava. Ceramic surfaces were pretreated with one of five surface treatment agents (Clearfil PhotoBond mixed with Porcelainbond activator (PB), Clearfil SE One mixed with Porcelainbond activator (SO), Ceramic Primer (CP), Universal Primer (UP), Scotchbond Universal (SU)), and then a resin cement (Clapearl DC) was filled. After 0, 5,000, and 10,000 thermocycles, micro-shear bond strengths between ceramic-cement interfaces were determined. SU exhibited significantly lower initial bond strength to AAA and e.max than PB, SO, CP, and UP. For Lava, PB, SO, CP and SU exhibited higher initial bond strengths than UP. Thermocycles reduced bond strengths to all the ceramic materials with any surface treatment.

show abstract

Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions

Cited by 151 publications

References 14 publications

The Effect of Surface Preparation and Luting Agent on Bond Strength to a Zirconium-based Ceramic

The Effect of Surface Preparation and Luting Agent on Bond Strength to a Zirconium-based Ceramic

Characterizing ceramics and the interfacial adhesion to resin: II- the relationship of surface treatment, bond strength, interfacial toughness and fractography

The effect of five kinds of surface treatment agents on the bond strength to various ceramics with thermocycle aging

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About