2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.09.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesion of metallic glass and epoxy in composite-metal bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be stated that the presence of the adhesive film was detrimental for the material strength, whereas the decrease of metal sheets number was positive. As concerns the former conclusion, it seemed to be in contradiction with past literature; in fact, several researchers [8,24,25] discovered an improvement due to the presence of the adhesive, but it must be underlined that the enhancement was found only for lap shear and interlaminar shear tests, while the in-plane mechanical properties, as the tensile strength, showed a similar behaviour. Only in the work of Li et al [25] the flexural behaviour was considered, but the same authors acknowledged their results to be highly depending on specimen and test geometry.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…It can be stated that the presence of the adhesive film was detrimental for the material strength, whereas the decrease of metal sheets number was positive. As concerns the former conclusion, it seemed to be in contradiction with past literature; in fact, several researchers [8,24,25] discovered an improvement due to the presence of the adhesive, but it must be underlined that the enhancement was found only for lap shear and interlaminar shear tests, while the in-plane mechanical properties, as the tensile strength, showed a similar behaviour. Only in the work of Li et al [25] the flexural behaviour was considered, but the same authors acknowledged their results to be highly depending on specimen and test geometry.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Each FML employed the same general stacking sequence; a four‐ply, [0/90] s composite layer was placed between each pair of metal layers. Previous research by the authors investigated adhesion methods for BMG‐based and Al‐based FMLs and determined that the strongest bond was achieved when the metal was initially degreased and an adhesive layer (3M Scotch‐Weld Structural Adhesive Film AF 163–2) was included at each composite‐metal interface . In this study, metal strips were cleaned with acetone prior to stacking, and the same adhesive layer was included.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be observed in Figure 3D1,F1 that the roughness of the silane treated samples reduced compared to that of mechanical polishing and alkali solution immersion (MPAL) and P2, indicating that a silane film was formed on the Al surface. Hamill and Nutt [28] used XPS to confirm the presence of a silane film on the Al2024 surface after silane treatment. The roughness data, Rq and Ra, of various surface-treated Al sheets obtained using AFM is shown in Table 3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because P2 etching presented a high porosity surface for the Al alloy [15]. Hamill and Nutt [28] found that the silane treatment did not substantially increase wettability or roughness of the Al alloy surface. However, it can improve the bonding ability between metal and epoxy through forming a covalent bond.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%