2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adhesive incisional drapes during cesarean delivery for preventing wound infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: ObjectiveTo compare the incidence of wound infection after cesarean delivery in procedures conducted using adhesive incisional drapes verses no adhesive incisional drapes.Study DesignSearches were performed in electronic databases (MEDLINE, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, OVID, EMBASE, and the PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews). We included randomized controlled trials comparing adhesive incisional drapes to no adhesive incisional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The surgical site should be draped with nonadhesive drapes as adhesive drapes are associated with an increased risk of infection. 12 This meta-analysis of 1943 patients showed a statistically significant increase in wound infections in patients in the adhesive incisional drape group compared with the control group (RR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02-1.65). However, studies are needed to explore this relationship in the setting of current postoperative infection prophylaxis, including broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, skin preparation, and vaginal cleansing.…”
Section: Nonadhe S Ive Dr Ape Smentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The surgical site should be draped with nonadhesive drapes as adhesive drapes are associated with an increased risk of infection. 12 This meta-analysis of 1943 patients showed a statistically significant increase in wound infections in patients in the adhesive incisional drape group compared with the control group (RR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02-1.65). However, studies are needed to explore this relationship in the setting of current postoperative infection prophylaxis, including broad-spectrum antibiotic coverage, skin preparation, and vaginal cleansing.…”
Section: Nonadhe S Ive Dr Ape Smentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The surgical site should be draped with nonadhesive drapes as adhesive drapes are associated with an increased risk of infection 12 . This meta‐analysis of 1943 patients showed a statistically significant increase in wound infections in patients in the adhesive incisional drape group compared with the control group (RR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.02–1.65).…”
Section: Nonadhesive Drapesmentioning
confidence: 91%