Adhesive joints using aluminium and CFRP substrates tested at low and high temperatures under quasi-static and impact conditions for the automotive industry

Machado, J.J.M.; Nunes, P.D.P.; Marques, E.A.S.; Silva, Lucas F. M. da

doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.09.067

Cited by 80 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 44 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Botelho et al [8] emphasized that the combination of metal and polymer composite laminates can create a synergistic effect on many properties. The results presented by Machado et al [39] presented the positive effect of preparing the dissimilar adhesive joints, using composite and aluminum substrates, by the modern crash resistant adhesives.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the adhesive joints’ strength of the similar and dissimilar systems of metal alloy/polymer composite

Rudawska

2019

Appl Adhes Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bonding technology is one of the most popular methods of joining various constructional materials [1-3]. It plays a vital role in production of different types of machines and tools [2]. This fact results from numerous advantages of the adhesive joints. The most important ones include the capacity of joining construction materials of different physical and chemical properties [4-6], as well as of significantly different sizes (e.g. thickness) [4, 7-9]. A lot of advantages of the adhesive joints have contributed to the fact that they are widely used in aviation [8, 10-12], aeronautics [13] and automotive [14, 15]. One of the most important advantages is the ability to make dissimilar joints [5, 16-18]. He and Ge [4] tested the effect of similar versus dissimilar assembled adherends of adhesively bonded composite joints, on the dynamic strength of single-lap. Pinto et al. [16] investigated the tensile strength of single-lap joints between similar and dissimilar adherends (included polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), carbon-epoxy (CFRP), and glass-polyester (GFRP) composites) bonded with an acrylic adhesive.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the adhesive joints’ strength of the similar and dissimilar systems of metal alloy/polymer composite

Rudawska

2019

Appl Adhes Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Experimental studies [ 16,31 ] were performed the impact test with an initial impact velocity using a drop weight equipment on SLJs. FEM model against the experimental results is compared to validate its reliability.…”

Section: Results Of Fem Calculationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Finite Element Analysis of Stress Wave Propagation in Adhesive Joints under Low Speed Impact Tensile Loadings

2020

Macro Theory & Simulations

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therefore, the failure load at which the SLJs with dissimilar substrates (CFRP + Al5754‐H22) failed was lower than that necessary to cause the failure by delamination of the CFRP substrates. An important observation was that the failure of the Al5754‐H22 substrates occurs mainly because of its cohesive mechanical properties rather than adhesive failure due to the provided surface treatment …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An important observation was that the failure of the Al5754-H22 substrates occurs mainly because of its cohesive mechanical properties rather than adhesive failure due to the provided surface treatment. 55…”

Section: Failure Loadmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fatigue performance of single lap joints with CFRP and aluminium substrates prior and after hygrothermal aging

Machado

Marques

Barbosa

et al. 2019

Fatigue Fract Eng Mat Struct

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adhesive bonding has been extensively used to join composites and aluminium alloys in the automotive industry, but a deeper understanding of its fatigue behaviour is still required. This work presents a novel evaluation of the combined performance of joints manufactured with carbon fibre reinforced plastic (CFRP) and aluminium substrates subjected to fatigue loads in the unaged, hygrothermally aged, and dried after hygrothermal aging states. The experimental results allowed to conclude that the fatigue performance of joints can be affected by changes induced by the drying process or losses in the interface strength and that dissimilar combination of substrates sustains higher number of cycles to failure. The fatigue performance of joints with dissimilar substrates was found to be better than that of joints with similar substrates, which can be attributed to the lower stresses acting on the adhesive layer. The presence of water has also noticeably changed the fatigue performance of joints with dissimilar substrates.

show abstract

Adhesive joints using aluminium and CFRP substrates tested at low and high temperatures under quasi-static and impact conditions for the automotive industry

Cited by 80 publications

References 44 publications

Comparison of the adhesive joints’ strength of the similar and dissimilar systems of metal alloy/polymer composite

Comparison of the adhesive joints’ strength of the similar and dissimilar systems of metal alloy/polymer composite

Finite Element Analysis of Stress Wave Propagation in Adhesive Joints under Low Speed Impact Tensile Loadings

Fatigue performance of single lap joints with CFRP and aluminium substrates prior and after hygrothermal aging

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About