2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adiabatic decohesion in a thermoplastic craze thickening at constant or increasing rate

Abstract: When a crack in a thermally non-diffusive material is impact loaded -or propagates at high speed -a cohesive process which resists slow crack extension may itself cause decohesion by adiabatic heating. By assuming that decohesion ultimately occurs by low-energy disentanglement within a melt layer of critical thickness, the fracture resistance of craze-forming crystalline polymers can be estimated quantitatively. Previous estimates used a simple, thermomechanically linear representation of craze fibril drawing.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interfacial shear stress distribution is very important for evaluation of the interfacial shear strength (Agrawal and Raj 1989;Chen et al 2000;Wang and Qiao 2004;Leevers and Godart 2008). Combining Eqs.…”
Section: Interfacial Shear Stress and Frictional Spring Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interfacial shear stress distribution is very important for evaluation of the interfacial shear strength (Agrawal and Raj 1989;Chen et al 2000;Wang and Qiao 2004;Leevers and Godart 2008). Combining Eqs.…”
Section: Interfacial Shear Stress and Frictional Spring Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering Figure 7 , it becomes clear why an improvement of fracture initiation properties due to rubber toughening of rate-sensitive plastics is ineffective at very high impact speeds (e.g., S4 tests). As G Ic ( v ) is possibly reduced to a minimum value [ 12 ], the fundamental rapid fracture resistance of different pipe grades during S4 testing at 16 m/s load speed can be considered to be primarily dependent on the dynamic crack propagation resistance G Id ( ) after crack initiation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although only the numerical implementation of the adiabatic decohesion model can give results when the relative craze density ρ * is finite, analytical solutions can be derived when ρ * = 0 and used as a reference. Analytical solutions for the impact reloading phase on a monolayer specimen have been fully described by Leevers and Godart (2007) and those during the skin retraction phase are derived in Appendix B. The computed and analytical results are compared in Fig.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the values of the parameters need to have the order of magnitude determined according to Leevers and Godart (2007): λ F should lie between 10 and 20, β cannot exceed 0.9 and s c should lie between 0.01 and 0.16 µm. In order to get the best agreement with the experimental traces with the chosen cohesive stress, the parameters were chosen so that the final displacement was the lowest, i.e.…”
Section: Cohesive Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%