1993
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.48.845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adiabatic population transfer in a multilevel system

Abstract: We report an experimental observation of coherent population transfer in a multilevel system by adiabatic following through a trapped state. Raman transitions between ground-state sublevels are induced by two partially overlapping o. + polarized laser beams, tuned to the hyperfine transition F =4~F'=4 of the cesium D2 line. An efficiency of more than 50%o is observed for the m+=+4 -+mz= -4 popula-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use the LU decomposition method. The numerical results are fitted by the formulae (7,8) very well. The fitting coefficients a, b, α and β depend on the angular momentum F and on the initial distribution among the vibrational levels.…”
Section: Sideband Raman Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use the LU decomposition method. The numerical results are fitted by the formulae (7,8) very well. The fitting coefficients a, b, α and β depend on the angular momentum F and on the initial distribution among the vibrational levels.…”
Section: Sideband Raman Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these problems are of a technical character and could be solved by different methods. For instance, atoms might be transfered from |F = 4, m = 4 to |F = 4, m = 0 without additional heating by the adiabatic passage technique [8], and the Ramsey region might be adequately isolated from the magnetic field. However, the problem of the light beams down the clock axis is more fundamental problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Referring to the caesium relative decay rates shown in figure 7, we see that of this 35% loss, 5 24 (7%) will decay straight to F = 3, m F = 0 and stay there as incoherent background; 3 8 (13%) will decay to F = 3, m F = 1, 2 and not affect the interferometer, other than a drop in total signal; 5 12 (15%) will decay to various F = 4 states and get pumped around again, possibly resulting in another few per cent ending up in F = 3 or 4, m F = 0. The net result of all this optical pumping will be that after one 'out and straight back' AT, ∼60% of the initial atoms are returned to F = 4, m F = 0 coherently, ∼10% will be present as incoherent background in F = 3 or 4, m F = 0 and the rest will be lost from the states involved in the interferometer.…”
Section: Optical Pumpingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AT with delayed laser pulses has been demonstrated by a number of groups [5][6][7][8][9] as a method for coherently transferring population between internal atomic states and simultaneously imparting momentum to them. It relies on the atoms remaining in a dark state, a superposition of ground states which is decoupled from the excited state.…”
Section: Adiabatic Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, a number of elegant experiments showing coherent control and creation of superpositions of Zeeman sublevels has been conducted with atomic beams of metastable neon [28,29,30]. We also note that the idea of using a stimulated Raman process to couple multiple groundstate Zeeman sublevels was previously explored theoretically [31] and that adiabatic passage between ground state sublevels of a cesium atomic beam has been demonstrated experimentally [32]. However, to our knowledge, our results here represent the first detailed treatment of Raman coupling between sublevels of the same groundstate Zeeman manifold in a way that takes into account both the excited state and the ground state level structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%