2003
DOI: 10.1021/jp030708a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adiabatic Population Transfer with Control Fields

Abstract: This paper explores the benefit of using time dependent basis sets in the description of adiabatic population transfer between molecular states. Using a time dependent basis set formalism, we develop a counter-diabatic field paradigm that generates adiabatic population transfer for apparently unfavorable conditions. We also describe a time dependent perturbation approach to account for the effect of stochastic dephasing on adiabatic population transfer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

5
897
0
6

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 726 publications
(927 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
897
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the single-component control in σ z makes optimal control much more difficult since a second operator does not exist that could be used to restore the desired adiabatic character [10], disallowing standard pulse shaping techniques [10,11] and "superadiabatic" theory [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the single-component control in σ z makes optimal control much more difficult since a second operator does not exist that could be used to restore the desired adiabatic character [10], disallowing standard pulse shaping techniques [10,11] and "superadiabatic" theory [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among other approaches let us mention (i) a transitionless tracking algorithm or "counterdiabatic" approach that adds to the original Hamiltonian extra terms to cancel transitions in the adiabatic or superadiabatic bases [8][9][10][11][12][13]; (ii) inverse engineering of the external driving [3,4,6,[21][22][23][24][25][26] based on Lewis-Riesenfeldt invariants [27], which has been applied in several expansion experiments [25,26]; (iii) optimal control (OC) methods [5,7,14,16], sometimes combined with other methods to enhance their performance [4,5,7]; (iv) the fast-forward (FF) approach advocated by Masuda and Nakamura [19,28]; (v) parallel adiabatic passage [29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A quantum system prepared initially in a given eigenstate of an Hamiltonian H f ree can remain in the corresponding instantaneous eigenstate of H f ree (t) on adding a specially designed term H c (t) to the Hamiltonian governing the evolution of the system [12,13]. Developing different protocols for achieving STA has been the focus of several studies, for example the application of counter-adiabatic terms [12][13][14], the fast forward approach [15] to name a few together with its application to two and three level atoms [16] and to universal quantum computation [17]. STA was also extended to the case of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians [18], and to open quantum systems governed by a Lindblad dynamics [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%