2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2011.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adiabatic shear failure in brittle solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These phenomena are relevant at the extremely high stresses and strain rates induced by shock loading. Further causes include the coalescence of dislocation loops under high shear stresses, as occurs upon quasi-static mechanical load 50 51 , and adiabatic shear, which is governed by elastic strain energy in brittle solids 52 . Arguably, both the high strain rate induced by impact loading, and the coalescence of defects and defect clusters formed during irradiation may play an important role in the amorphization process observed here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These phenomena are relevant at the extremely high stresses and strain rates induced by shock loading. Further causes include the coalescence of dislocation loops under high shear stresses, as occurs upon quasi-static mechanical load 50 51 , and adiabatic shear, which is governed by elastic strain energy in brittle solids 52 . Arguably, both the high strain rate induced by impact loading, and the coalescence of defects and defect clusters formed during irradiation may play an important role in the amorphization process observed here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following prior phase field analysis [Clayton, 2014c], the elastic shear modulus µ =Ĉ 66 degrades completely upon solid-state localization, consistent with (3.48) and [Clayton, 2016b]. The regularization length l and intrinsic surface energy are chosen to have magnitudes corresponding to those for fracture since failure accompanies amorphization in experiments and since widths of amorphous zones observed experimentally are on the order of a nanometer [Yan et al, 2009;Grady, 2011], similar in magnitude to the fracture process zone size. In particular, l is computed via (3.51), where here τ = µ/(2π) is the theoretical shear strength [Clayton, 2011].…”
Section: Materials Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…To be noted, the real material should be elastic-plastic. Provided the velocity of stress-release (even the propagation velocity of the elastic-plastic interface) is significantly lower than the elastic wave velocity (Lee, 1967), including elasticity in this analysis does not greatly alter the fluxes of energy and momentum into the shear band region, especially at strain rate higher than 10 3 /s (Grady, 1992;Grady, 2011). Except for the very early time response, which is elastic, the accuracy of rigid-plastic solution suffices for present study.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%