2009
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2008-2000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adipose tissue lipogenic gene networks due to lipid feeding and milk fat depression in lactating cows

Abstract: Dietary lipid supplements have been extensively evaluated for their effects on mammary tissue mRNA abundance, including the classical lipogenic genes ACACA, SCD, FASN, and the transcription regulators SREBF1, THRSP, and PPARG. Novel gene isoforms with key regulatory roles in triacylglycerol synthesis have been recently identified including LPIN1 and AGPAT6. Transcriptional networks (i.e., genes whose mRNA expression is regulated by a transcription factor or nuclear receptor) coordinate adipogenesis and lipid f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

8
46
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Marine n-3 PUFA have been found to be involved in the suppression of lipogenic genes in liver (Kaur and Sinclair 2010). In our study, feeding the diet enriched with n-3 PUFA significantly upregulated the relative mRNA expression of LPIN1, which was consistent with the report of Thering et al (2009). The significant changes for LPIN1 implied that its expression levels were under the post-transcription regulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Marine n-3 PUFA have been found to be involved in the suppression of lipogenic genes in liver (Kaur and Sinclair 2010). In our study, feeding the diet enriched with n-3 PUFA significantly upregulated the relative mRNA expression of LPIN1, which was consistent with the report of Thering et al (2009). The significant changes for LPIN1 implied that its expression levels were under the post-transcription regulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Several studies have highlighted the stability of goat milk fat secretion and composition under a variety of feeding strategies (Chilliard et al, 2007), including diet supplementation with sunflower-seed oil and fish oil (Bernard et al, 2010), which is a combination of lipid supplements that causes milk fat depression in dairy cows and sheep (Thering et al, 2009;Invernizzi et al, 2010;Toral et al, 2010). Although comparisons between studies can seldom be made because of the few data available in goats and the variation in basal diet composition and/or lipid supplementation, inter-species differences in lipid metabolism have been highlighted previously (Chilliard et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, reductions in milk fat synthesis in cows fed plant oils rich in n-6 PUFA and fish oil have been related to variations in lipogenic gene expression not only in the mammary gland but also in other body tissues (Harvatine and Bauman, 2006;Thering et al, 2009;Invernizzi et al, 2010). Although these changes were attributed in cows to modifications in the partitioning of nutrients towards non-mammary tissues (Thering et al, 2009), studies in dairy goats characterising lipid metabolism in body tissues or nutritional regulation are still scant to assume that the same may happen in this species (Bernard et al, 2005a and. Further, there is no available information on simultaneous measurements of FA composition, expression of genes encoding key lipogenic enzymes and related transcription factors in goat body tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies on diet-induced MFD in cows report an increase in the mRNA abundance of lipogenic genes in AT related to the preferential partitioning of nutrients towards non-mammary tissues (Harvatine et al, 2009;Thering et al, 2009;Schmitt et al, 2011). On the contrary, lipid supplementation inducing no changes or increases in milk fat yield in goats is not accompanied by alterations of the mRNA abundance or activity of lipogenic enzymes in AT (Bernard et al, 2005a and2009a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%