Two variants of a conceptual, Mach 1.5 low-boom airframe are developed using a nonlinear, inviscid flow solver coupled with an adjoint-based shape optimization framework. In the first variant, a wing planform with a large trailing edge extension shields the undertrack observer from the nozzle shock system. The size of this extension is reduced on the second variant, allowing unobstructed passage of the nozzle shock. Each variant is evaluated in both powered and flow-through states using high-resolution meshes constructed using an adaptive, adjoint-driven approach. Conventional converging-diverging nozzles are examined at cruise and full-reheat thrust, while two plug nozzles with di↵ering cone angles are examined at the cruise thrust condition. For each case, performance is characterized in terms of the e↵ect on the near-field pressure signal, the propagated ground signature, and the predicted loudness level at the ground. The results show that for this configuration, shielding e↵ectively controls the sonic boom level at the ground regardless of nozzle power state. In the absence of shielding, the reduced flow-field disturbance due to a plug nozzle is shown to o↵er only slightly reduced low-boom performance relative to the un-powered baseline.
NomenclatureJ Shape optimization objective J r Mesh refinement objective A Cross-sectional area, ft 2 A e Equivalent area distribution, ft 2 b Superellipse segment height, ft C D Drag coe cient C L Lift coe cient C p Pressure coe cient h Vehicle nose height above near-field sensor, ft L E↵ective length, ft L/D Lift-to-drag ratio L s Nozzle plug support sting length, ft M Mach number n Superellipse exponent p Static pressure r Radius, ft r f Nozzle plug fillet radius, ft r p Nozzle plug radius, ft r s Nozzle plug support sting radius, ft S Near-field sensor length, ft s Distance along near-field sensor, ft S ref Reference area, ft 2