2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10114-005-0685-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint Functors and Representation Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that in this case, T is separating and splitting. So, the above theorem also generalizes the result [11,Theorem 6.5]. For APR-tilting modules, the next step is: when the simple module S has injective dimension 2, what can we say about the representation dimensions of A and B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Note that in this case, T is separating and splitting. So, the above theorem also generalizes the result [11,Theorem 6.5]. For APR-tilting modules, the next step is: when the simple module S has injective dimension 2, what can we say about the representation dimensions of A and B.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…In [11,Theorem 6.5], the tilting modules considered are separating and splitting. (2) Note that under the assumption of the above theorem, the algebras A and B are not stably equivalent in general.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For further information about advances on the finitistic dimension conjecture as well as its relationship with other homological conjectures in the representation theory of Artin algebras, we may refer to [7,29,30,33,34] and the references therein. For representation dimension, we refer to [2,4,10,28,31,32] and the references therein.…”
Section: Lemma 21 For Any Artin Algebra a There Is A Function ψ Whmentioning
confidence: 99%