2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-27683-0_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint Logic with a 2-Category of Modes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many classical results about adjunctions can be replayed inside MTT. For instance, by carrying out a proof that left adjoints preserve colimits we recover modal or crisp induction principles for the left adjoint [43,67]. We can then show e.g.…”
Section: Internal Adjunctionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many classical results about adjunctions can be replayed inside MTT. For instance, by carrying out a proof that left adjoints preserve colimits we recover modal or crisp induction principles for the left adjoint [43,67]. We can then show e.g.…”
Section: Internal Adjunctionsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We will now show concretely how MTT can be used in specific modal situations by varying the mode theory. We will focus on two different examples: guarded recursion [16,21,51], which captures productive recursive definitions through a combination of modalities, and adjoint modalities [43,44,61,67,71], where two modalities form an adjunction internal to the type theory. In both cases we will show how to reconstruct examples from op.…”
Section: Applying Mttmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Now we have to choose how to represent S. One possibility would be to add further new judgement forms so that it could be characterized similarly to and . The general theory of Licata and Shulman (2016) immediately suggests how to do this, but the judgmental structure of the resulting theory would be substantially more complicated. Moreover, semantically it seems likely to correspond to indexing the base topos over the cohesive topos by means of p !…”
Section: The Problem Of Comonadic Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A type system that uniformly integrates all of these patterns is not obvious if we want to preserve the desirable properties of session fidelity and deadlock freedom that we obtain from binary session types. Underlying our approach is adjoint logic [24,15,23], which generalizes intuitionistic linear logic [12,11] and LNL [2] by decomposing the usual exponential modality !A into two adjoint modal operators and also affords individual control over the structural rules of weakening and contraction. We provide a formulation of adjoint logic in which cut reduction corresponds to asynchronous communication, and from which session fidelity and deadlock freedom derive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%