2010
DOI: 10.2118/119112-pa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint Multiscale Mixed Finite Elements

Abstract: Summary We develop an adjoint model for a simulator consisting of a multiscale pressure solver and a saturation solver that works on flow-adapted grids. The multiscale method solves the pressure on a coarse grid that is close to uniform in index space and incorporates fine-grid effects through numerically computed basis functions. The transport solver works on a coarse grid adapted by a fine-grid velocity field obtained by the multiscale solver. Both the multiscale solver for pressure and the fl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For both the Cartesian and the flowbased coarse grids, the coarse-scale saturation error is the largest initially and decays towards water breakthrough; the qualitative behaviour of the fine-scale error is almost identical, and the corresponding curves are therefore not reported. It may come as a surprise how well both the static Cartesian and the flow-based grid capture the water-cut curve for layer 1, given the large initial error, but this result is in correspondence with previous observations [1,15] both for Cartesian and corner-point models. For layer 37, we also observe how using a static flow-based grid gives a significant Fig.…”
Section: Dynamically Adaptive Gridsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For both the Cartesian and the flowbased coarse grids, the coarse-scale saturation error is the largest initially and decays towards water breakthrough; the qualitative behaviour of the fine-scale error is almost identical, and the corresponding curves are therefore not reported. It may come as a surprise how well both the static Cartesian and the flow-based grid capture the water-cut curve for layer 1, given the large initial error, but this result is in correspondence with previous observations [1,15] both for Cartesian and corner-point models. For layer 37, we also observe how using a static flow-based grid gives a significant Fig.…”
Section: Dynamically Adaptive Gridsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Another example of flow-based gridding on cornerpoint grids was presented by Krogstad et al [15], who used such grids to accelerate forward simulations in a production optimization workflow. In the next section, we will give a more quantitative study of the gridding methods introduced in the previous section when applied together with the multiscale transport solver (Eq.…”
Section: Example 3 (Facies Model) We Consider a Rectangular Domain Wimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7) for saturation. In addition, an adjoint code for the multiscale method combined with the flow-based coarsening approach is included, see [22].…”
Section: Example 7 (Primary Production From a Gas Reservoir)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, even though the mathematical framework presented by [30] and [19] does not limit the derivation of the adjoint equations to any particular solution strategy, no explicit discussion on how it can be applied to sequentially coupled system of equations was presented. A multiscale adjoint method applied to life-cycle optimization is presented by [20], in which a sequential solution of flow and transport is employed, such that, consequentially, the adjoint model also follows a sequential solution strategy. However, in that work, the discussion is focused on the promising computational savings provided by multiscale simulation and not so much detail is given as to what extent the gradient computation itself can impose challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%