2021
DOI: 10.1029/2021jb021648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adjoint Tomography of Ambient Noise Data and Teleseismic P Waves: Methodology and Applications to Central California

Abstract: Traditional teleseismic traveltime tomography using body waves has imaged a lot of high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) models of mantle structures (e.g.,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
(204 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, these high-velocity anomalies have a velocity comparable to the Feather River Ophiolite (serpentinized ultramafic rocks) and match well with the magnetic potential anomaly in this area, and thus are interpreted as pieces of ancient oceanic crust preserved during the past tectonic collision and subduction (Benz et al, 1992;Thurber et al, 2009). Low velocities at the LVC and CVF areas have been observed in both crustal Vp and Vs images from local (Flinders et al, 2018;Seccia et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2011) and regional (e.g., Jiang et al, 2018;Jones et al, 2014;Thurber et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2021) tomographic studies and are mostly attributed to melting and heating from mantle upwelling due to the foundering of the dense lower crust or lithosphere (e.g., Bernardino et al, 2019;Boyd et al, 2004;Jones et al, 2014;Zandt et al, 2004). Beneath the LVC, our Vp model reveals two low-velocity zones (<−8%) at depths of less than 3-4 km and depths of 7-16 km, separated by a weak low-velocity zone (with the magnitude less than 2%, CC' and FF' in Figure 7).…”
Section: Structural Heterogeneitiessupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, these high-velocity anomalies have a velocity comparable to the Feather River Ophiolite (serpentinized ultramafic rocks) and match well with the magnetic potential anomaly in this area, and thus are interpreted as pieces of ancient oceanic crust preserved during the past tectonic collision and subduction (Benz et al, 1992;Thurber et al, 2009). Low velocities at the LVC and CVF areas have been observed in both crustal Vp and Vs images from local (Flinders et al, 2018;Seccia et al, 2011;Yang et al, 2011) and regional (e.g., Jiang et al, 2018;Jones et al, 2014;Thurber et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2021) tomographic studies and are mostly attributed to melting and heating from mantle upwelling due to the foundering of the dense lower crust or lithosphere (e.g., Bernardino et al, 2019;Boyd et al, 2004;Jones et al, 2014;Zandt et al, 2004). Beneath the LVC, our Vp model reveals two low-velocity zones (<−8%) at depths of less than 3-4 km and depths of 7-16 km, separated by a weak low-velocity zone (with the magnitude less than 2%, CC' and FF' in Figure 7).…”
Section: Structural Heterogeneitiessupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Low velocities at the LVC and CVF areas have been observed in both crustal Vp and Vs images from local (Flinders et al., 2018; Seccia et al., 2011; Yang et al., 2011) and regional (e.g., Jiang et al., 2018; Jones et al., 2014; Thurber et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2021) tomographic studies and are mostly attributed to melting and heating from mantle upwelling due to the foundering of the dense lower crust or lithosphere (e.g., Bernardino et al., 2019; Boyd et al., 2004; Jones et al., 2014; Zandt et al., 2004). Beneath the LVC, our Vp model reveals two low‐velocity zones (<−8%) at depths of less than 3–4 km and depths of 7–16 km, separated by a weak low‐velocity zone (with the magnitude less than 2%, CC’ and FF’ in Figure 7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the stacking process mitigates local lateral heterogeneity within each subarray, the lateral resolution of the raw subarray will be smeared. Therefore, this technique cannot be directly used for 2D seismic imaging, for example, full waveform inversion (Sager et al., 2018; W. Wang et al., 2017), adjoint tomography (K. Wang et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2018) and wave‐equation dispersion inversion (Li et al., 2017; H. Liu et al., 2022); while it would be appropriate for our dispersion curve inversion where 1D or layer model is assumed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teleseismic full‐waveform inversion (FWI) also uses finite‐frequency misfit kernels to invert for velocity and density models with a nonlinear iterative algorithm (Monteiller et al., 2015; K. Wang et al., 2021a). This method has been applied to continental subduction zones to constrain lateral heterogeneities (Beller et al., 2018; K. Wang et al., 2021b; Y. Wang et al., 2016). However, teleseismic FWI needs high‐quality coherent P coda waves on vertical and radial components, which are rare in real data due to complex source spectral contents (Beller et al., 2018), especially for high frequency data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%