Abstract-Unstable angina is a critical phase of coronary heart disease with widely variable symptoms and prognosis. A decade ago, a classification of unstable angina based on clinical symptoms was introduced. This system was then validated by prospective clinical studies to correlate with the prognosis and was linked to angiographic and histological findings. It has been used to categorize patients in many large clinical trials. In recent years, the pathophysiological roles of platelet activation and inflammation in unstable angina have been elucidated. Subsequently, improved markers of myocardial injury, acute-phase proteins, and hemostatic markers that may be associated with clinical outcomes have been identified. Particularly, cardiac-specific troponin T and troponin I have been shown to represent the best predictors of early risk in patients with angina at rest. Accordingly, it is suggested that the original classification be extended by subclassifying one large group of unstable angina patients, ie, those with angina at rest within the past 48 hours (class IIIB), into troponin-positive (T pos ) and troponin-negative (T neg ) patients. The 30-days risk for death and myocardial infarction is considered to be up to 20% in class IIIB-T pos but Ͻ2% in class IIIB-T neg patients. Initial results suggest that troponins may function as surrogate markers for thrombus formation and can effectively guide therapy with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists or low-molecular-weight heparins. These observations provide additional impetus for adding the measurement of these markers to the clinical classification and represent a novel concept of treating these high-risk patients. (Circulation. 2000;102:118-122.)Key words: angina Ⅲ atherosclerosis Ⅲ coronary disease Ⅲ myocardial infarction Ⅲ prognosis I t has long been recognized that coronary artery disease comprises a wide spectrum of conditions, ranging from chronic stable angina to acute myocardial infarction. Unstable angina, in the middle of this spectrum is a heterogeneous syndrome with widely variable symptoms and prognosis. In 1989, a classification of unstable angina was introduced 1 ; this classification is based on the clinical history (accelerated exertional angina or rest pain, the timing of the latter in respect to presentation, and the clinical circumstances in which unstable angina developed), on the presence or absence of ECG changes, and on the intensity of anti-ischemic therapy.Although the development of this classification was based on clinical experience, it has been validated in a number of prospective studies. For example, Calvin et al 2 studied 393 patients with unstable angina and reported that a history of a myocardial infarction within 14 days (class C) and STsegment depression on the presenting ECG were both markers of increased risk. Miltenburg-van Zijl et al 3 classified 417 patients with unstable angina and followed them up for 6 months. Death or myocardial infarction occurred more frequently in those with recent rest pain (class III) and in postin...